Difference between revisions of "User talk:I-ghost/Help:GCF"
m (I agree.) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The contents are all good, but it seems like some parts could be more clear to people who aren't familiar, since I assume that's the goal of the article. VOs could be "voiceovers" and the paths would be easier to read if the GCF filenames were shortened to prefixes like '''materials'''/... and '''content'''/... | The contents are all good, but it seems like some parts could be more clear to people who aren't familiar, since I assume that's the goal of the article. VOs could be "voiceovers" and the paths would be easier to read if the GCF filenames were shortened to prefixes like '''materials'''/... and '''content'''/... | ||
Are closed captioning filenames really '''closecaption_lan.txtg''' or is that a typo? --[[User:Fashnek|Fashnek]] 17:28, 13 November 2011 (PST) | Are closed captioning filenames really '''closecaption_lan.txtg''' or is that a typo? --[[User:Fashnek|Fashnek]] 17:28, 13 November 2011 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yeah, I think that's a typo. If it's not, I don't know WHAT it is. -[[User:NameUser|NameUser]] 22:15, 25 June 2012 (PDT) | ||
== Open Review == | == Open Review == | ||
Revision as of 05:15, 26 June 2012
Clarity
The contents are all good, but it seems like some parts could be more clear to people who aren't familiar, since I assume that's the goal of the article. VOs could be "voiceovers" and the paths would be easier to read if the GCF filenames were shortened to prefixes like materials/... and content/... Are closed captioning filenames really closecaption_lan.txtg or is that a typo? --Fashnek 17:28, 13 November 2011 (PST)
Yeah, I think that's a typo. If it's not, I don't know WHAT it is. -NameUser 22:15, 25 June 2012 (PDT)
Open Review
Can this flag get removed to clear out the associated task list entry? User:Darkid/Sig 14:02, 2 June 2012 (PDT)
- I agree. NameUser 22:14, 25 June 2012 (PDT)
