Difference between revisions of "Talk:Medieval Update"
Scatmanjohn (talk | contribs) (Blog mention) |
|||
(18 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hi, just wondering, is there any confirmation or source that shows this will be blog mentioned? [[File:User ScatmanJohn Logo.png|25px]][[User:Scatmanjohn|<b><sup>Scatman</sup> <sub>John</sub></b>]][[File:User Scatmanjohn Jr bob dobbs.png|30px]] <small>([[User talk:Scatmanjohn|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Scatmanjohn|Contrib]])</small> 17:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | Hi, just wondering, is there any confirmation or source that shows this will be blog mentioned? [[File:User ScatmanJohn Logo.png|25px]][[User:Scatmanjohn|<b><sup>Scatman</sup> <sub>John</sub></b>]][[File:User Scatmanjohn Jr bob dobbs.png|30px]] <small>([[User talk:Scatmanjohn|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Scatmanjohn|Contrib]])</small> 17:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | :17:52 - Pie_Tony: better not, has some reveiling things on it | ||
+ | :When asked for a screenshot of the email - [[User:Pogo|Pogo]] 17:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::Well that's not very helpful. I think a copy should be saved to your sandbox and this article deleted from the main namespace until it is featured in a blog post. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 18:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == News mention == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Its featured in the news section. This article should not be deleted. <small>— ''The preceding unsigned comment was added by'' '''[[User:Ruffmajorkc|Ruffmajorkc]]''' ([[User talk:Ruffmajorkc|talk]]) • ([[Special:Contributions/Ruffmajorkc|contribs]]) </small> | ||
+ | : Who's saying it should be deleted? [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 12:43, 27 July 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Addention of model images == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since there were models in the update shoudn't we try to show them here to?--[[User:Flashflood153|Flashflood153]] 20:15, 2 August 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : If we can find them --[[User:ScoutKast|ScoutKast]] 21:29, 2 August 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | ::There were images in the book pages, that werew the download links--[[User:Flashflood153|Flashflood153]] 11:23, 3 August 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Question == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why doesn't it say what weapon it replaces when it's downloaded? [[User:Damian0358|Damian0358]] 15:11, 5 November 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | :Because we don't need info on what it replaces. That info is on the website for the "update". '''[[User:404 User Not Found|404: User Not Found]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:404_User_Not_Found|(talk)]]</sup> 14:59, 5 November 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::OK, removed it. [[User:Damian0358|Damian0358]] 15:01, 5 November 2011 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Another question == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why isn't this page and the "Night of the Living Update" page as detailed as the "fancy vs. Nasty Update" page? [[User:Damian0358|Damian0358]] 05:10, 11 December 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | :People haven't gotten around to it yet. '''[[User:404 User Not Found|404: User Not Found]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:404_User_Not_Found|(talk)]]</sup> 11:26, 11 December 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | :: May I start to detail both the pages, or let someone else do it? [[User:Damian0358|Damian0358]] 11:45, 11 December 2011 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Community Update Guide == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Is it ethical to make pages on all of the weapons but state that they are fanmade? --[[User:Ojcoolj|Ojcoolj]] 13:44, 5 July 2012 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Tudor Topper Update == | ||
+ | The Tudor Topper was re-submitted in the workshop, and was updated. Should we keep the link to the original that was released in the Medieval Update, or can I update the link to the newer version, and change the credits to include the second new contributor. [[User:TheNoobThatWas|TheNoobThatWas]] ([[User talk:TheNoobThatWas|talk]]) 17:54, 1 August 2013 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 00:54, 2 August 2013
Contents
Blog mention
Hi, just wondering, is there any confirmation or source that shows this will be blog mentioned? Scatman John (Talk | Contrib) 17:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- 17:52 - Pie_Tony: better not, has some reveiling things on it
- When asked for a screenshot of the email - Pogo 17:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well that's not very helpful. I think a copy should be saved to your sandbox and this article deleted from the main namespace until it is featured in a blog post. —Moussekateer·talk 18:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
News mention
Its featured in the news section. This article should not be deleted. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ruffmajorkc (talk) • (contribs)
- Who's saying it should be deleted? Balladofwindfishes 12:43, 27 July 2011 (PDT)
Addention of model images
Since there were models in the update shoudn't we try to show them here to?--Flashflood153 20:15, 2 August 2011 (PDT)
- If we can find them --ScoutKast 21:29, 2 August 2011 (PDT)
- There were images in the book pages, that werew the download links--Flashflood153 11:23, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
Question
Why doesn't it say what weapon it replaces when it's downloaded? Damian0358 15:11, 5 November 2011 (PDT)
- Because we don't need info on what it replaces. That info is on the website for the "update". 404: User Not Found (talk) 14:59, 5 November 2011 (PDT)
- OK, removed it. Damian0358 15:01, 5 November 2011 (PDT)
Another question
Why isn't this page and the "Night of the Living Update" page as detailed as the "fancy vs. Nasty Update" page? Damian0358 05:10, 11 December 2011 (PST)
- People haven't gotten around to it yet. 404: User Not Found (talk) 11:26, 11 December 2011 (PST)
- May I start to detail both the pages, or let someone else do it? Damian0358 11:45, 11 December 2011 (PST)
Community Update Guide
Is it ethical to make pages on all of the weapons but state that they are fanmade? --Ojcoolj 13:44, 5 July 2012 (PDT)
Tudor Topper Update
The Tudor Topper was re-submitted in the workshop, and was updated. Should we keep the link to the original that was released in the Medieval Update, or can I update the link to the newer version, and change the credits to include the second new contributor. TheNoobThatWas (talk) 17:54, 1 August 2013 (PDT)