Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stickybomb Launcher"
(Links in page sections) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Er, links in page sections (i.e. <nowiki>==[[Damage]]==</nowiki>) are bad practice. AWB also automatically removes them. Why were they put in, and why not put a hatnote instead? -- [[User:Pilk|Pilk]] <sub>([[User talk:Pilk|talk]])</sub> 09:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC) | Er, links in page sections (i.e. <nowiki>==[[Damage]]==</nowiki>) are bad practice. AWB also automatically removes them. Why were they put in, and why not put a hatnote instead? -- [[User:Pilk|Pilk]] <sub>([[User talk:Pilk|talk]])</sub> 09:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the list of related patches, there is a note saying "Demoman's secondary weapon has been renamed to Stickybomb Launcher." Does this mean it was actually called the Pipe Bomb Launcher before that patch? | ||
Revision as of 01:40, 14 November 2010
Links in page sections
Er, links in page sections (i.e. ==[[Damage]]==) are bad practice. AWB also automatically removes them. Why were they put in, and why not put a hatnote instead? -- Pilk (talk) 09:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
In the list of related patches, there is a note saying "Demoman's secondary weapon has been renamed to Stickybomb Launcher." Does this mean it was actually called the Pipe Bomb Launcher before that patch?
