Difference between revisions of "Talk:Community Medic strategy"
Szthesquid (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== No mention of the battle medic? == | == No mention of the battle medic? == | ||
I think we should at least have a section on battle medics, as it is a play style that is used by many players. Not having a section on it is kind of turning a blind eye to a common occurrence, so i think it should be mentioned, possibly in the advanced strategies section. | I think we should at least have a section on battle medics, as it is a play style that is used by many players. Not having a section on it is kind of turning a blind eye to a common occurrence, so i think it should be mentioned, possibly in the advanced strategies section. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Map-specific ubercharge strategy == | ||
| + | I think it's a good idea in concept, but the way it's turned out, it just looks like a list of chokepoints and defensible locations for only two maps -- Dustbowl and Gravel Pit. I'd suggest scrapping the section altogether; it's much more efficient to just look up a map and read up on the chokepoints. --[[User:Szthesquid|Szthesquid]] 19:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:05, 30 November 2010
No mention of the battle medic?
I think we should at least have a section on battle medics, as it is a play style that is used by many players. Not having a section on it is kind of turning a blind eye to a common occurrence, so i think it should be mentioned, possibly in the advanced strategies section.
Map-specific ubercharge strategy
I think it's a good idea in concept, but the way it's turned out, it just looks like a list of chokepoints and defensible locations for only two maps -- Dustbowl and Gravel Pit. I'd suggest scrapping the section altogether; it's much more efficient to just look up a map and read up on the chokepoints. --Szthesquid 19:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
