Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jack5wikia"
m |
(→Fortress Blast: new section) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:: I don't intend to promote the weapon as ideal or anything, I'm just saying that it's unnecessary to say it's a bad weapon. ⇒[[File:Leaderboard class spy.png|16px|link=]] [[User:Anyar|<span style="font-size: 16px; font-family: TF2 Build">Anyar</span>]] ([[User_talk:Anyar|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Anyar|contributions]]/[[User:Anyar/No|giveaway]]) 19:52, 21 October 2017 (PDT) | :: I don't intend to promote the weapon as ideal or anything, I'm just saying that it's unnecessary to say it's a bad weapon. ⇒[[File:Leaderboard class spy.png|16px|link=]] [[User:Anyar|<span style="font-size: 16px; font-family: TF2 Build">Anyar</span>]] ([[User_talk:Anyar|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Anyar|contributions]]/[[User:Anyar/No|giveaway]]) 19:52, 21 October 2017 (PDT) | ||
::: Thanks dude. Good work with the article otherwise. ⇒[[File:Leaderboard class spy.png|16px|link=]] [[User:Anyar|<span style="font-size: 16px; font-family: TF2 Build">Anyar</span>]] ([[User_talk:Anyar|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Anyar|contributions]]/[[User:Anyar/No|giveaway]]) 16:49, 22 October 2017 (PDT) | ::: Thanks dude. Good work with the article otherwise. ⇒[[File:Leaderboard class spy.png|16px|link=]] [[User:Anyar|<span style="font-size: 16px; font-family: TF2 Build">Anyar</span>]] ([[User_talk:Anyar|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Anyar|contributions]]/[[User:Anyar/No|giveaway]]) 16:49, 22 October 2017 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Fortress Blast == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi there, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Seeing as this mod was released recently, and that you (the author) is the developer as well, this sort of leaves the impression of an attempt to openly promote said mod by using the Wiki as an advertisement tool. | ||
| + | |||
| + | While any user may contribute an article, it is usually highly frowned upon when creators do so in order to gain exposure for their work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Even if that wasn't the intend, the mod in question does not adhere to our guidelines in regard to [[TFW:Policies#Mod notability|Mod notability]], and therefore the page will be subject to deletion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you do however, have any concrete proof of significant notability, please provide it on [[Talk:Fortress Blast|its talk page]]. Do feel free to move the content to your user space instead. Thanks! [[File:User Wookipan Golden Strawberry.png|10px|link=]] [[User:Wookipan|<span style="color:#db9c1f">'''Wookipan'''</span>]] <small>([[User_talk:Wookipan|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Wookipan|contribs]])</small> 16:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:52, 17 November 2019
zombie survival
If the Solemn Vow's bonus feature is unnecessary, then it is essentially the same as the Bonesaw. Then why recommend Bonesaw but say: "Weapons that are discouraged from use in Zombie Survival...the Solemn Vow"? Why not just put it right next to the Bonesaw?
Besides, it could still be useful. Engineers take 2 hits (or 3 with Gunslinger) to kill when prone. But when they aren't prone? If you're attacking a group of Engies that will likely kill you soon, you should probably choose a target to go after, and the Vow can help. ⇒
Anyar (talk/contributions/giveaway) 15:03, 17 October 2017 (PDT)
- reply?
- replied again
- I don't intend to promote the weapon as ideal or anything, I'm just saying that it's unnecessary to say it's a bad weapon. ⇒ Anyar (talk/contributions/giveaway) 19:52, 21 October 2017 (PDT)
- Thanks dude. Good work with the article otherwise. ⇒ Anyar (talk/contributions/giveaway) 16:49, 22 October 2017 (PDT)
- Thanks dude. Good work with the article otherwise. ⇒
Fortress Blast
Hi there,
Seeing as this mod was released recently, and that you (the author) is the developer as well, this sort of leaves the impression of an attempt to openly promote said mod by using the Wiki as an advertisement tool.
While any user may contribute an article, it is usually highly frowned upon when creators do so in order to gain exposure for their work.
Even if that wasn't the intend, the mod in question does not adhere to our guidelines in regard to Mod notability, and therefore the page will be subject to deletion.
If you do however, have any concrete proof of significant notability, please provide it on its talk page. Do feel free to move the content to your user space instead. Thanks! 
Wookipan (talk | contribs) 16:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
