Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Concept art"
GrampaSwood (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Split == Not necessarily a split, but rather an additional category for non-Valve concept art (e.g. Workshop or Polycount art), it would be something like :Category:Commu...") |
(→Split: re) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Split == | == Split == | ||
Not necessarily a split, but rather an additional category for non-Valve concept art (e.g. Workshop or Polycount art), it would be something like [[:Category:Community concept art]] which would have this category as a category as well so it does show up here. I think the distinction between Valve and community concept art is important because nowadays, the concept art from the community is very often just a simple drawing of the cosmetic. While Valve's concept art usually contains different concepts that were proposed (such as different weapon designs).<br>[[File:BLU Wiki Cap.png|20px|link=List of Wiki Cap owners]] | [[Help:Group rights|<span style="color:green;font-family:TF2 Build;">s</span>]] | [[User:GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">GrampaSwood</font>]] [[File:PraisetheSun.png|20px|alt=Praise the Sun!]] ([[User talk:GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">talk</font>]]) ([[Special:Contributions/GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">contribs</font>]]) 23:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC) | Not necessarily a split, but rather an additional category for non-Valve concept art (e.g. Workshop or Polycount art), it would be something like [[:Category:Community concept art]] which would have this category as a category as well so it does show up here. I think the distinction between Valve and community concept art is important because nowadays, the concept art from the community is very often just a simple drawing of the cosmetic. While Valve's concept art usually contains different concepts that were proposed (such as different weapon designs).<br>[[File:BLU Wiki Cap.png|20px|link=List of Wiki Cap owners]] | [[Help:Group rights|<span style="color:green;font-family:TF2 Build;">s</span>]] | [[User:GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">GrampaSwood</font>]] [[File:PraisetheSun.png|20px|alt=Praise the Sun!]] ([[User talk:GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">talk</font>]]) ([[Special:Contributions/GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">contribs</font>]]) 23:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : {{c|no}}. I understand the distinction you're making, but it seems unnecessary as both of these are forms of concept art. I also see the point of splitting them just for the sake of "''Valve made this? Epic!!''" and "''Community stuff? Ew...''", but I fail to see how it would improve this category. | ||
| + | : If there's a need for reworking this category, my suggestion would be to categorize them by type ("weapon concept art", "cosmetic concept art" etc.) and by artist (following the NPP policy). — [[User:Tark|<span style="font-weight:bold;color: #5BC236">Tark</span>]] 00:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:22, 27 December 2023
Split
Not necessarily a split, but rather an additional category for non-Valve concept art (e.g. Workshop or Polycount art), it would be something like Category:Community concept art which would have this category as a category as well so it does show up here. I think the distinction between Valve and community concept art is important because nowadays, the concept art from the community is very often just a simple drawing of the cosmetic. While Valve's concept art usually contains different concepts that were proposed (such as different weapon designs).
| s | GrampaSwood 
(talk) (contribs) 23:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
No. I understand the distinction you're making, but it seems unnecessary as both of these are forms of concept art. I also see the point of splitting them just for the sake of "Valve made this? Epic!!" and "Community stuff? Ew...", but I fail to see how it would improve this category.- If there's a need for reworking this category, my suggestion would be to categorize them by type ("weapon concept art", "cosmetic concept art" etc.) and by artist (following the NPP policy). — Tark 00:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
