Difference between revisions of "Talk:Comics"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(No text?: new section)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
Where get? -- [[User:Smashman|Smashman...]] <sub>([[User_talk:Smashman|t]] • <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/smashman2004 s])</span></sub> 13:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 
Where get? -- [[User:Smashman|Smashman...]] <sub>([[User_talk:Smashman|t]] • <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/smashman2004 s])</span></sub> 13:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Loose canon OMG ==
 +
 +
I found something written on the third last part of the comic. It says:
 +
 +
<code>LIFE EXTENDER MACHINE
 +
 +
 +
July 17th 1894 -
 +
 +
Built for Blutarch Mann
 +
 +
 +
August 3rd 1894 -
 +
 +
Built for Redmond Mann
 +
 +
 +
April 14th XXXX -
 +
Built for XXXXXXXX</code>
 +
 +
It seems Engi Grandpa built the machine for 3 people (at least), and not only two, as the story suggested! Who it could be?

Revision as of 17:22, 3 July 2010

Create and add the comics?

Anyone think it'd be a good idea? -- Smashman... (ts) 21:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

I'd say just link to the comics with a brief description instead. The Neotank 21:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
I like the idea. We have articles on trailers with less canonical content, so why the comics which DO have canon content aren't included baffles me. Noizeblaze 22:05, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Holy shit. Good timing. I was about to start the comic article TODAY. -- En Ex 22:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
YAY, comics. :D -- En Ex 00:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

No text?

Where get? -- Smashman... (ts) 13:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Loose canon OMG

I found something written on the third last part of the comic. It says:

LIFE EXTENDER MACHINE


July 17th 1894 -

Built for Blutarch Mann


August 3rd 1894 -

Built for Redmond Mann


April 14th XXXX - Built for XXXXXXXX

It seems Engi Grandpa built the machine for 3 people (at least), and not only two, as the story suggested! Who it could be?