Difference between revisions of "Talk:Googly Gazer"
m (→Harry Potter reference?) |
m (→Picture) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
So it might just be me, but the picture used of the Engineer with the eye looks a bit too skinny. Has anyone else noticed this? If other people feel the same way that I do, we should address this issue and fix it. [[User:Fate Soul Blake|Fate Soul Blake]] 12:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | So it might just be me, but the picture used of the Engineer with the eye looks a bit too skinny. Has anyone else noticed this? If other people feel the same way that I do, we should address this issue and fix it. [[User:Fate Soul Blake|Fate Soul Blake]] 12:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Well, [[File:Engineer_googly_gazer.png|a new version]] was already implemented, but it doesn't seem like it's working for now. {{n}} [[File:Duel_RED.png|link=User:EpicEric|20px|sub]] [[User:EpicEric|<span style="color:#5885A2;font-size:15px;font-family: | ||
| + | 'Trebuchet MS';text-shadow:#e3e3e3 1px 1px 0px;"><b>Epic</b></span>]] [[User:EpicEric|<span style="color:#B8383B;font-size:15px;font-family: | ||
| + | 'Trebuchet MS';text-shadow:#e3e3e3 1px 1px 0px;"><b>Eric</b></span>]]{{mod}} [[File:Duel_BLU.png|link=User:EpicEric|20px|sub]]<span style="font-size:10px"> ([[User talk:EpicEric|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/EpicEric|C]])</span> 20:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:30, 8 April 2011
 | Notice: This talk page is not a forum for general discussion of Googly Gazer, it is for discussions about the article. Please use the Official Team Fortress 2 Forums instead. |
Class
Is it 100% sure it's for Egnineer? I thought it was for Sniper at first :( Benvil 20:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yes it is. And yes, looks like the Sniper didn't get anything for this new update... at least for now. DSylom 21:08, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Paintable
I changed Paintable to yes, because the creator said he wants it to be a paintable item in a Polycount thread. I can post link if evidence is needed. Corkscrew 19:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe he does but Valve can change the item as they see fit. We won't know if it's paintable for sure until it's in-game or in the store. —
Moussekateer·talk 20:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Darn Valve.... Corkscrew 20:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Harry Potter reference?
Just sayin', this looks A LOT like the fake, magical eye of Alastor "mad-eye" Moody.--Kid Of The Century 21:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Unless the creator turns around to says 'Yeah I based it off Mad-Eye Moody's magical eye', it is just speculation and has no place here.--Focusknock 21:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I wasn't going to start the Trivia section. :) Besides, the original doesn't look like that. --Kid Of The Century 21:43, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- That isn't actually the original, that was the finished product. Valve implemented the original, which the maker later changed into the version you posted. Hefaistus 21:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- It's even called "Engineer's Mad Eye", that's clearly a reference. Soldyhurr 23:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that it's a Harry Potter reference. Just a Gigolo 15:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Better ask it directly to the creator, and set this once and for all.--Kid Of The Century 20:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that it's a Harry Potter reference. Just a Gigolo 15:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- It's even called "Engineer's Mad Eye", that's clearly a reference. Soldyhurr 23:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- That isn't actually the original, that was the finished product. Valve implemented the original, which the maker later changed into the version you posted. Hefaistus 21:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I wasn't going to start the Trivia section. :) Besides, the original doesn't look like that. --Kid Of The Century 21:43, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Picture
So it might just be me, but the picture used of the Engineer with the eye looks a bit too skinny. Has anyone else noticed this? If other people feel the same way that I do, we should address this issue and fix it. Fate Soul Blake 12:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Well, a new version was already implemented, but it doesn't seem like it's working for now. –
Epic Eric 
(T | C) 20:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
