Difference between revisions of "Talk:Backburner"
(→HIDDEN: new section) |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Yes? No? Should HIDDEN stats be added to the weapon info boxes? --[[User:Firestorm|<font color="#FF6600"><tt><big><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></big></tt></font>]] {{mod}} 18:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | Yes? No? Should HIDDEN stats be added to the weapon info boxes? --[[User:Firestorm|<font color="#FF6600"><tt><big><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></big></tt></font>]] {{mod}} 18:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I'd say yes, especially when they're not obvious like this — [[User:WindPower|<span style="font-weight:bold;">Wind</span>]] {{adm}} 18:30, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:30, 9 August 2010
Firstly I'd like like to make it clear that the Backburner was in fact affected by the (now) 10% damage nerf to the flamethrower. The BB does 15% more than the current damage of flamethrower, not the pre-update damage; if it did that, it would be doing closer to 25% more than the current FT damage, which it isn't according to the numbers here. So compared to the old Backburner, it's actually doing only about 3.5% more (115% of 90%), not 15%.
Secondly, is there a way we can express this on the page? Right now it's kind of misleading by not mentioning the nerf, implying that the Backburner actually got a straight 15% damage buff. Jimbo Jambo 06:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
HIDDEN
Yes? No? Should HIDDEN stats be added to the weapon info boxes? --Firestorm 18:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- I'd say yes, especially when they're not obvious like this — Wind 18:30, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
