Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unarmed Combat"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Set Bonus?: Son, you just got signed.)
(New quote?: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Set Bonus? ==
 
== Set Bonus? ==
 
Does this weapon provide the set bonus and if so, should we write that it does on the page? <small>— ''The preceding unsigned comment was added by'' '''[[User:MEDUNN|MEDUNN]]''' ([[User talk:MEDUNN|talk]]) • ([[Special:Contributions/MEDUNN|contribs]]) 13:04, 28 October 2011</small>
 
Does this weapon provide the set bonus and if so, should we write that it does on the page? <small>— ''The preceding unsigned comment was added by'' '''[[User:MEDUNN|MEDUNN]]''' ([[User talk:MEDUNN|talk]]) • ([[Special:Contributions/MEDUNN|contribs]]) 13:04, 28 October 2011</small>
 +
 +
== New quote? ==
 +
 +
I think we should change the quote to the unused scout line "Hey, gimme back my legbone! Ow, don't hit me with it!" Yes, it's cheesy, and slightlyunfitting, but better than the current one. Also, that quote is already on the eternal reward page. [[User:NitromathThePizzaGuy|NitromathThePizzaGuy]] 17:01, 28 October 2011 (PDT)

Revision as of 00:01, 29 October 2011

Set Bonus?

Does this weapon provide the set bonus and if so, should we write that it does on the page? The preceding unsigned comment was added by MEDUNN (talk) • (contribs) 13:04, 28 October 2011

New quote?

I think we should change the quote to the unused scout line "Hey, gimme back my legbone! Ow, don't hit me with it!" Yes, it's cheesy, and slightlyunfitting, but better than the current one. Also, that quote is already on the eternal reward page. NitromathThePizzaGuy 17:01, 28 October 2011 (PDT)