Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Pyromania Nav"
(→There were no sets added this update) |
m (Darkid moved page Template talk:PyromaniaNav to Template talk:Pyromania Nav: Naming consistency) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:This could just be a mistake on Valve's part. The advert clearly states/shows that these are item sets. Leave them in for now. [[User:Sqq xing|kenny]] 15:19, 28 June 2012 (PDT) | :This could just be a mistake on Valve's part. The advert clearly states/shows that these are item sets. Leave them in for now. [[User:Sqq xing|kenny]] 15:19, 28 June 2012 (PDT) | ||
::Until the game refers to them being in a set, we should not list them as being such. --'''[[User:Piemanmoo|Piemanmoo]]''' 15:20, 28 June 2012 (PDT) | ::Until the game refers to them being in a set, we should not list them as being such. --'''[[User:Piemanmoo|Piemanmoo]]''' 15:20, 28 June 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | ::: If you recall, the [[June 27, 2012 Patch|patch]] specifically mentioned "Added new items: City on Fire item sets". | ||
| + | ::: Keep the pages up and the latest revisions just in case Valve manages to fix it. [[File:User_Upgrade_Signature.png|link=User:Upgrade]] 16:39, 28 June 2012 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:37, 11 August 2013
There were no sets added this update
Despite what the blog says, none of the items are in sets in-game, they're all individual items. Balladofwindfishes 14:55, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
- This could just be a mistake on Valve's part. The advert clearly states/shows that these are item sets. Leave them in for now. kenny 15:19, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
- Until the game refers to them being in a set, we should not list them as being such. --Piemanmoo 15:20, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
- If you recall, the patch specifically mentioned "Added new items: City on Fire item sets".
- Keep the pages up and the latest revisions just in case Valve manages to fix it.
16:39, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
- Until the game refers to them being in a set, we should not list them as being such. --Piemanmoo 15:20, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
