|
|
| (29 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == Weapon Associated - Gunboats ==
| + | {{Talk archive |
| − | | + | | arc1name = Archive 1 |
| − | I'm thinking this should be removed for the Soldier. The weapon isn't actually in the shot. Otherwise, we could just add "Gunboats" to the other two Demoman shots below. Open to discussion [[User:StarYoshi|StarYoshi]] 22:29, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
| + | | arc1link = Talk:Poses/Archive 1 |
| − | : I agree. Unless there's any objections, I'm removing it. --[[User:Jetamo|Jetamo]] 10:17, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
| + | }} |
| − | | |
| − | == Weapon Associations Revisisted ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | This is a question I'd like to present simply because I can't think of a really clear-cut answer. Some of these poses (e.g. many of the Soldier ones) are directly tied to a weapon, or have a weapon in the actual model/on the TF2 blog. However, some of these (like the Scout pose) were not directly aimed at marketing the Scattergun so much as the double-jump-crouch bug. I'm just thinking we need a sort of standard:
| |
| − | 1) Do we include a weapon associated only if the weapon was a part of the actual pose? | |
| − | 1a) Should we only include weapons if the pose was made for the marketing of that weapon? (e.g. Scout pose)
| |
| − | 2) If a pose is related to a weapon (e.g. Demoman poses for Victory/loss), should the weapon be added to the pose.
| |
| − | 2a) If a pose is lacking a weapon, should the "Weapon Associated" column stay empty?
| |
| − | | |
| − | What do you guys think? [[User:StarYoshi|StarYoshi]] 18:02, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
