|
|
| (14 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == Weapon Associated - Gunboats ==
| + | {{Talk archive |
| − | | + | | arc1name = Archive 1 |
| − | I'm thinking this should be removed for the Soldier. The weapon isn't actually in the shot. Otherwise, we could just add "Gunboats" to the other two Demoman shots below. Open to discussion [[User:StarYoshi|StarYoshi]] 22:29, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
| + | | arc1link = Talk:Poses/Archive 1 |
| − | : I agree. Unless there's any objections, I'm removing it. --[[User:Jetamo|Jetamo]] 10:17, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
| + | }} |
| − | | |
| − | == Weapon Associations Revisisted ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | This is a question I'd like to present simply because I can't think of a really clear-cut answer. Some of these poses (e.g. many of the Soldier ones) are directly tied to a weapon, or have a weapon in the actual model/on the TF2 blog. However, some of these (like the Scout pose) were not directly aimed at marketing the Scattergun so much as the double-jump-crouch bug. I'm just thinking we need a sort of standard:
| |
| − | 1) Do we include a weapon associated only if the weapon was a part of the actual pose? | |
| − | 1a) Should we only include weapons if the pose was made for the marketing of that weapon? (e.g. Scout pose)
| |
| − | 2) If a pose is related to a weapon (e.g. Demoman poses for Victory/loss), should the weapon be added to the pose.
| |
| − | 2a) If a pose is lacking a weapon, should the "Weapon Associated" column stay empty?
| |
| − | | |
| − | What do you guys think? [[User:StarYoshi|StarYoshi]] 18:02, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == I'm suggesting this page for deletion. ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I'm not certain why we have this page, but it serves no notable purpose. What say you? Is this page worth removing? [[User:Zoolooman|Zoolooman]] 21:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I'm a bit confused, I assumed it was referring to humiliation poses by the title. As is, it serves no purpose whatsoever.--[[User:Subtlefuge|Subtlefuge]] 21:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | : I have no idea what this page is for either [[User:Scatmanjohn|<b><sup>Scatman</sup> <sub>John</sub></b>]][[File:User_Scatman.png|25px]] <small>([[User talk:Scatmanjohn|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Scatmanjohn|Contrib]])</small> 21:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :{{c|agree}} I can't think of an article less trivial than a list of poses used by the blog... '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:83%;">—[[File:User Moussekateer signature sprite.png|31px|link=User:Moussekateer]][[User:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black">Moussekateer</span>]]·[[User talk:Moussekateer|<span style="color:black;font-size:82%;">talk</span>]]</span>''' 21:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :{{c|agree}} Blast it, doc! — [[File:Item_icon_Bonk!_Atomic_Punch.png|link=http://wiki.teamfortress.com/wiki/User:Neo_Player|25px]] [[User:Neo_Player|<span style="color: #FF6600; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-shadow:orange 0px 0px 2px;">Neo_Player</span>]] <sup>([[User_talk:Neo_Player|<span style="background: #FFFF00; color: #FF0000; padding: 0 1px;">t</span>]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/Neo_Player|<span style="background: #FF0000; color: #FFFF00; padding: 0 1px;">c</span>]])</sup> 21:23, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :{{c|oppose}} This page has potential in my opinion. I don't think deleting it is a good idea. -- [[User:OluapPlayer|<font color="red">'''OluapPlayer'''</font>]] <sub>([[User_talk:OluapPlayer|t]])</sub> {{adm}} [[File:User OluapPlayer Sig.png|Howdy, pardner!]] 21:26, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I'm opposed to the deletion also, I don't believe the deletion reason has much merit in this instance. [[User:Seb26|<font color="#000">'''seb26'''</font>]] [[User talk:Seb26|<span style="font-size:95%; color:#EA6B1C;">[talk]</span>]] 21:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :{{c|oppose}} I oppose deletion. While trivial, these poses have been used to promote important parts of TF2's history. If anything, they should be reimplemented into the articles they promote (WAR! Update, post-war update, Demoman/Soldier/Heavy article, etc). Sorry, forgot my tildes. [[User:Sven|Sven]] 21:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :{{c|agree}} Unless someone put those poses in the respective weapon pages, i don't see what's the reason of having this page. -- [[File:User Swordz Swordz.png|25px]][[User:Swordz|<span style="color:#70B04A;font-size:13px;font-family:
| |
| − | 'TF2 Build';text-shadow:#e3e3e3 1px 1px 0px;"><u>Swordz</u></span>]]{{mod}}[[File:User Swordz Swordz.png|25px]] <span style="font-size:10px">([[User talk:Swordz|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Swordz|contribs]])</span> 21:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :{{c|oppose}} This is a stub. More so, this page is intended to be expanded on to include more than just the marketing poses of the game. We've been debating how far to go with it, but the people involved in it haven't really had time to do so. Furthermore, you've given no other reason for its deletion other than it "not serving any notable purpose." I could run over to [[Skins]] page and say that it "serves no notable purpose" for the very reason that it doesn't cover anything overly important (by the logic being applied here). I'd rather discuss what's "wrong" with the page so we can work to fix it before we nuke the page entirely. [[User:StarYoshi|StarYoshi]] 22:06, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :{{c|oppose}} Doesn't merit a deletion. Like stated, it holds bits and pieces of TF2's history and the like. I didn't even know there was a demoman victory pose until I looked at this page, so you never know! --[[User:Vaught|<span style="text-shadow:pink 0px 0px 3px;"><font color=" #FFA6C9"><tt><big>'''Vaught'''</big></tt></font>]]</span> 22:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
| |
