Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Set"
(→Getting a little hasty with the new Uber update sets) |
BrazilianNut (talk | contribs) m (→Effect optional) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
We don't even know if they're item sets, if they have set bonuses or anything like that. They could just be a group of related items that otherwise have no real bonus to using them all together. I'd say let's hold off until we know for sure. [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 12:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC) | We don't even know if they're item sets, if they have set bonuses or anything like that. They could just be a group of related items that otherwise have no real bonus to using them all together. I'd say let's hold off until we know for sure. [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 12:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I'd say let's hold on until we know for sure. {{n}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Image|RED}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Text|Epic|#5885A2}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Text|Eric|#B8383B}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Image|BLU}}{{User:EpicEric/Sig/Extra}} 14:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC) | :I'd say let's hold on until we know for sure. {{n}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Image|RED}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Text|Epic|#5885A2}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Text|Eric|#B8383B}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Image|BLU}}{{User:EpicEric/Sig/Extra}} 14:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pro and Con templates == | ||
| + | |||
| + | How about adding {{Pro}}and {{Con}}icons to sets that have an on wearer effect? Like this: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Set/table | ||
| + | | set = The Gas Jockey's Gear | ||
| + | | item1 = Degreaser | ||
| + | | item2 = Powerjack | ||
| + | | item3 = Attendant | ||
| + | | effect = {{Pro}}+10% faster move speed on wearer<br/>{{Con}}+10% bullet damage vulnerability on wearer | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | So, what do you think? <span style="color:#404040;font-size:13px;font-family:TF2 Build">— written by</span> [[User:K1LL|<span style="color:#385374;font-size:14px;font-family:TF2 Build">K1LL</span>]] <span style="color:#404040;font-size:13px;font-family:TF2 Build">at</span> 10:22, 2 May 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It still is confusing for me the +- and -+ effects... so i'm against it. however if this reworded without actual - and + in the text i say this is a good idea. But effects are short and easy to read so i guess it's okay as it is now. [[User:TheDoctor|TheDoctor]] 10:27, 2 May 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Still, we use the icons for weapons Pros and Cons in their respective class page, see [[Pyro#Weapons|Pyro weapon's page]]. <span style="color:#404040;font-size:13px;font-family:TF2 Build">— written by</span> [[User:K1LL|<span style="color:#385374;font-size:14px;font-family:TF2 Build">K1LL</span>]] <span style="color:#404040;font-size:13px;font-family:TF2 Build">at</span> 10:31, 2 May 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | :{{c|Support}} Doesn't do any harm. '''» [[User:Cooper Kid|<span style="color:red">Coo</span><span style ="color:gray">per</span><span style ="color:blue"> Kid</span>]]''' <small>([[User_talk:Cooper Kid|blether]]) • ([[Special:Contributions/Cooper Kid|contreebs]])</small> 10:36, 2 May 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Pyromania Sets == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm new and I'm trying to help get some of the pyromania pages up to speed. Is there anything that can be done to expedite the process of getting the set template up-to-date when the resources (models, etc.) become available? [[User:The Grand Karkasmolen|The Grand Karkasmolen]] 22:32, 26 June 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Main article optional == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Can we make the main article optional, but have it be enabled by default? Like <nowiki>{{set|SetName|main=no}}</nowiki>. Currently on item set pages it looks wonky, [[Special Delivery (item set)|a set page]].<br>[[User:GrampaSwood|GrampaSwood]] ([[User talk:GrampaSwood|talk]]) 16:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | : {{c|done}} — [[User:Tark|<span style="font-weight:bold;color: #5BC236">Tark</span>]] [[Help:Group rights#Moderators|<span class="locbg">lm</span>]][[Help:Language_translation|<span class="locbg">(pt-br)</span>]] 16:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Effect optional == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This template is also used in the articles for the individual item sets, which also list effects in the infobox and in the articles themselves right below this template if they exist. Adding a <code>effect=no</code> option would reduce repetition. - [[User:BrazilianNut|BrazilianNut]] ([[User talk:BrazilianNut|talk]]) 10:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:49, 20 May 2022
Contents
Header links
Why not link the item sets back to their stub on the set page? GJ 20:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- They already do link back to Item sets. -The Neotank (Talk)
00:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- The icon to the side does, but the header doesn't. I didn't even realize the icon to the side was a link. GJ 03:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Getting a little hasty with the new Uber update sets
We don't even know if they're item sets, if they have set bonuses or anything like that. They could just be a group of related items that otherwise have no real bonus to using them all together. I'd say let's hold off until we know for sure. Balladofwindfishes 12:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Pro and Con templates
How about adding 
and 
icons to sets that have an on wearer effect? Like this:
| The Gas Jockey's Gear | |
|---|---|
|
|
| Effect |
|
So, what do you think? — written by K1LL at 10:22, 2 May 2012 (PDT)
It still is confusing for me the +- and -+ effects... so i'm against it. however if this reworded without actual - and + in the text i say this is a good idea. But effects are short and easy to read so i guess it's okay as it is now. TheDoctor 10:27, 2 May 2012 (PDT)
- Still, we use the icons for weapons Pros and Cons in their respective class page, see Pyro weapon's page. — written by K1LL at 10:31, 2 May 2012 (PDT)
- Support Doesn't do any harm. » Cooper Kid (blether) • (contreebs) 10:36, 2 May 2012 (PDT)
Pyromania Sets
I'm new and I'm trying to help get some of the pyromania pages up to speed. Is there anything that can be done to expedite the process of getting the set template up-to-date when the resources (models, etc.) become available? The Grand Karkasmolen 22:32, 26 June 2012 (PDT)
Main article optional
Can we make the main article optional, but have it be enabled by default? Like {{set|SetName|main=no}}. Currently on item set pages it looks wonky, a set page.
GrampaSwood (talk) 16:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Done — Effect optional
This template is also used in the articles for the individual item sets, which also list effects in the infobox and in the articles themselves right below this template if they exist. Adding a effect=no option would reduce repetition. - BrazilianNut (talk) 10:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
