Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gentle Munitionne of Leisure"
(→Does it will be paintable ?: new section) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I am Concerned about the main picture of the frightened heavy, as pose seems irrelevant to the content. can this be changed or explained? | I am Concerned about the main picture of the frightened heavy, as pose seems irrelevant to the content. can this be changed or explained? | ||
[[User:ColonelGaraffi|ColonelGaraffi]] 14:55, 10 July 2012 (PDT)<ColonelGaraffi> | [[User:ColonelGaraffi|ColonelGaraffi]] 14:55, 10 July 2012 (PDT)<ColonelGaraffi> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Does it will be paintable ? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | i would like to know if it will be paintable because it will be great if someone know something let me know thanks :D [[User:MrZAIR|MrZAIR]] 08:26, 21 October 2012 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:26, 21 October 2012
Marked for deletion?
...Why? It's still new, it's kind of normal the page is low quality... —BobMathrotus 09:33, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
- Whoever did it was trolling or didnt know what he was doing. They attempted it four times. Im not sure how to remove it without re-building the page, it will get fixed though - Wolfbane5001 12:42, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
Feecksed. It was referencing the wrong pages, and those deletion tags were not meant to show up here. rZ 12:49, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
Bad Picture
I am Concerned about the main picture of the frightened heavy, as pose seems irrelevant to the content. can this be changed or explained? ColonelGaraffi 14:55, 10 July 2012 (PDT)<ColonelGaraffi>
Does it will be paintable ?
i would like to know if it will be paintable because it will be great if someone know something let me know thanks :D MrZAIR 08:26, 21 October 2012 (PDT)
