Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cosmetic items"
Villager3056 (talk | contribs) |
(→Merging the update histories) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
is it necessary to put 3D models on every cosmetic item page, so viewers can see what the item looks like [[User:Villager3056|Villager3056]] ([[User talk:Villager3056|talk]]) 05:45, 31 January 2014 (PST) | is it necessary to put 3D models on every cosmetic item page, so viewers can see what the item looks like [[User:Villager3056|Villager3056]] ([[User talk:Villager3056|talk]]) 05:45, 31 January 2014 (PST) | ||
| + | : No. It would be too much work. A simple preview is enough anyways since 3D models are a bit heavy. [[User:Ashes|Ashes]] ([[User talk:Ashes|talk]]) 07:04, 31 January 2014 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 15:04, 31 January 2014
Merging the update histories
Should I add all changes, even the really tiny changes like material changes to the update history bit? I'm unsure. Davo - (Talk|Contribs) 05:41, 15 January 2014 (PST)
- Add only the added items, equip region changes, bugs related to cosmetic slot/all cosmetic
Rikka Takanashi (talk) • (contributions) 05:51, 15 January 2014 (PST)
is it necessary to put 3D models on every cosmetic item page, so viewers can see what the item looks like Villager3056 (talk) 05:45, 31 January 2014 (PST)
