Difference between revisions of "Talk:B.A.S.E. Jumper"
(→Should it be noted?) |
(→Should it be noted?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Should it be noted? == | == Should it be noted? == | ||
| − | Allowing yourself to be set on fire with the B.A.S.E. Jumper deployed will allow you to maximize the advantages in mid-air (almost infinite Air Strike barrages, unexpected rockets from above, less visibility, etc.) since you can stay in the air much, much, much longer at the cost of 60+ hp. I think the strategical use of being set on-fire should be noted. | + | Allowing yourself to be set on fire with the B.A.S.E. Jumper deployed will allow you to maximize the advantages in mid-air (almost infinite Air Strike barrages, unexpected rockets from above, less visibility, etc.) since you can stay in the air much, much, much longer at the cost of 60+ hp. I think the strategical use of being set on-fire should be noted. [[User:J192|J192]] ([[User talk:J192|talk]]) 06:34, 20 June 2014 (PDT) |
| − | + | :Being able to suspend in air while on fire is a glitch, I don't think VALVe intended that. This is more of abusing the glitch than a legit strategy. But if Valve approves of the technique and doesn't patch it, I guess it's fair game. --<span style="border:4px inset #E6B800; padding:2px; border-radius:1em;"> Heeeeyyyy, everybody! It's Meester Tweester! </span> 13:11, 12 July 2014 (PDT) | |
| − | [[User:J192|J192]] ([[User talk:J192|talk]]) 06:34, 20 June 2014 (PDT) | ||
I think that Valve should make the [[Whirly Warrior]], the [[B.A.S.E. Jumper]] and the [[Air Strike]] a set, and the effect being air raid siren with spotlight shooting out and up from behind the soldier while the soldier salutes. It would make a very nice themed new set for one of the potential new updates in the future. If anyone agrees with me please tell me. [[User:Xxpowerhouserxx|Xxpowerhouserxx]] ([[User talk:Xxpowerhouserxx|talk]]) 22:10, 1 July 2014 (PDT) | I think that Valve should make the [[Whirly Warrior]], the [[B.A.S.E. Jumper]] and the [[Air Strike]] a set, and the effect being air raid siren with spotlight shooting out and up from behind the soldier while the soldier salutes. It would make a very nice themed new set for one of the potential new updates in the future. If anyone agrees with me please tell me. [[User:Xxpowerhouserxx|Xxpowerhouserxx]] ([[User talk:Xxpowerhouserxx|talk]]) 22:10, 1 July 2014 (PDT) | ||
: This sort of "suggestion" does not belong on here, Try taking it to the steam forums instead. [[User:Ashes|Ashes]] ([[User talk:Ashes|talk]]) 23:50, 1 July 2014 (PDT) | : This sort of "suggestion" does not belong on here, Try taking it to the steam forums instead. [[User:Ashes|Ashes]] ([[User talk:Ashes|talk]]) 23:50, 1 July 2014 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:11, 12 July 2014
Should it be noted?
Allowing yourself to be set on fire with the B.A.S.E. Jumper deployed will allow you to maximize the advantages in mid-air (almost infinite Air Strike barrages, unexpected rockets from above, less visibility, etc.) since you can stay in the air much, much, much longer at the cost of 60+ hp. I think the strategical use of being set on-fire should be noted. J192 (talk) 06:34, 20 June 2014 (PDT)
- Being able to suspend in air while on fire is a glitch, I don't think VALVe intended that. This is more of abusing the glitch than a legit strategy. But if Valve approves of the technique and doesn't patch it, I guess it's fair game. -- Heeeeyyyy, everybody! It's Meester Tweester! 13:11, 12 July 2014 (PDT)
I think that Valve should make the Whirly Warrior, the B.A.S.E. Jumper and the Air Strike a set, and the effect being air raid siren with spotlight shooting out and up from behind the soldier while the soldier salutes. It would make a very nice themed new set for one of the potential new updates in the future. If anyone agrees with me please tell me. Xxpowerhouserxx (talk) 22:10, 1 July 2014 (PDT)
