Difference between revisions of "File talk:Eyelander.png"
TerminalGear (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::So... The image is perfect... must be a new model of demoman :S The image is good, don't improve it[[User:Danimart|danimart]] 12:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | :::So... The image is perfect... must be a new model of demoman :S The image is good, don't improve it[[User:Danimart|danimart]] 12:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Eh... Should this image have been removed from the [[Eyelander]] page? ~ [[User:TerminalGear|TerminalGear]] 23:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | Eh... Should this image have been removed from the [[Eyelander]] page? ~ [[User:TerminalGear|TerminalGear]] 23:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I don't think, it looks fine to me. [[User:Octaytse|Octaytse]] 03:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:34, 11 November 2010
I don't recall it being on fire... -Shine[] 20:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm, I just tried it again with sv_pure set to 2, and the fire effect remains. ~ TerminalGear 21:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's the normal eye glow at four heads. At least that's what it looked like the last time I got four heads or the killcam showed his ugly mug with the firey eye. --Vaught 19:47, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- So... The image is perfect... must be a new model of demoman :S The image is good, don't improve itdanimart 12:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- That's the normal eye glow at four heads. At least that's what it looked like the last time I got four heads or the killcam showed his ugly mug with the firey eye. --Vaught 19:47, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Eh... Should this image have been removed from the Eyelander page? ~ TerminalGear 23:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
I don't think, it looks fine to me. Octaytse 03:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)