Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stickybomb Launcher"
m |
m (→Links in page sections) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Er, links in page sections (i.e. <nowiki>==[[Damage]]==</nowiki>) are bad practice. AWB also automatically removes them. Why were they put in, and why not put a hatnote instead? -- [[User:Pilk|Pilk]] <sub>([[User talk:Pilk|talk]])</sub> 09:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC) | Er, links in page sections (i.e. <nowiki>==[[Damage]]==</nowiki>) are bad practice. AWB also automatically removes them. Why were they put in, and why not put a hatnote instead? -- [[User:Pilk|Pilk]] <sub>([[User talk:Pilk|talk]])</sub> 09:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | In the list of related patches, there is a note saying "Demoman's secondary weapon has been renamed to Stickybomb Launcher." Does this mean it was actually called the Pipe Bomb Launcher before that patch? | + | In the list of related patches, there is a note saying "Demoman's secondary weapon has been renamed to Stickybomb Launcher." Does this mean it was actually called the Pipe Bomb Launcher before that patch? [[User:Doc|Doc]] 01:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:41, 14 November 2010
Links in page sections
Er, links in page sections (i.e. ==[[Damage]]==) are bad practice. AWB also automatically removes them. Why were they put in, and why not put a hatnote instead? -- Pilk (talk) 09:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
In the list of related patches, there is a note saying "Demoman's secondary weapon has been renamed to Stickybomb Launcher." Does this mean it was actually called the Pipe Bomb Launcher before that patch? Doc 01:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC)