Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ze Goggles"
(→Worth Noting?) |
(→First described hat: new section) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
When made Vintage, Ze Goggles aren't properly worded. You wouldn't say Vintage The Kritzkrieg, it's The Vintage Kritzkrieg. Yes, I know this is minor, but I'm a tad bored too. [[User:Psychopath|Psychopath]] 19:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC) | When made Vintage, Ze Goggles aren't properly worded. You wouldn't say Vintage The Kritzkrieg, it's The Vintage Kritzkrieg. Yes, I know this is minor, but I'm a tad bored too. [[User:Psychopath|Psychopath]] 19:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
:You would be correct if ''Ze Goggles'' were named ''Goggles'', but they're not; ''Ze Goggles'' is a proper noun and thus the adjective, ''Vintage'' works perfectly fine in front of them. :) -[[User:RJackson|<span class="burbg" style="margin-right:1px;text-shadow: #538237 1px 1px 0px;">RJ</span>]]{{Sta}} 19:55, 17 November 2010 (UTC) | :You would be correct if ''Ze Goggles'' were named ''Goggles'', but they're not; ''Ze Goggles'' is a proper noun and thus the adjective, ''Vintage'' works perfectly fine in front of them. :) -[[User:RJackson|<span class="burbg" style="margin-right:1px;text-shadow: #538237 1px 1px 0px;">RJ</span>]]{{Sta}} 19:55, 17 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == First described hat == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Is it worth mentioning that this hat had a description before the Describing Contest, and was the only hat to have a description up until that point? [[User:Onyyx|Onyyx]] 09:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:57, 25 January 2011
Contents
Earbuds, headware?
I'll take your word, but if they're headware, why aren't they listed as head? --DogGunn 08:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- I think he's making the distinction between "headwear" and Hats; headwear is anything on your head (including Misc. Items), hats are hats — WindPower 08:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- That's generally how we've described them so far. -Firestorm 08:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Hat Describing Contest Vs. "Nothing."
Will "Nothing." description be replaced? Or will it just be a minor description? {{subst:void|This template should always be substituted. Please change {{Unsigned}} to {{subst:Unsigned}}}}— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sinic (talk) • (contribs) 2024-11-24, 15:54 UTC
- Please remember to sign and date your message with four tildes, like so: ~~~~.
- "Nothing" is just a minor description that appears in the game. As the hat describing contest will require a minimum of 50 words its unlikely to be replaced. --Picard lm(de) 00:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Worth Noting?
When made Vintage, Ze Goggles aren't properly worded. You wouldn't say Vintage The Kritzkrieg, it's The Vintage Kritzkrieg. Yes, I know this is minor, but I'm a tad bored too. Psychopath 19:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- You would be correct if Ze Goggles were named Goggles, but they're not; Ze Goggles is a proper noun and thus the adjective, Vintage works perfectly fine in front of them. :) -RJ 19:55, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
First described hat
Is it worth mentioning that this hat had a description before the Describing Contest, and was the only hat to have a description up until that point? Onyyx 09:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)