User:Lexar/New Weapon Row

Table Modification

Right Now

	Weapon	Kill Icon	Ammo Loaded	Ammo Carried	Damage Range	Notes / Special Abilities
Stock	Flamethrower		Fire: 200 Air blasts: 10 (same reserve)	N/A	Base (Max): 139.5 / sec. Crit (Max): 418.5 / sec. Afterburn: 6 / sec. × 10 secs.1	Secondary fire blasts compressed air which knocks back enemies, redirects enemy projectiles, and extinguishes flames on teammates, using 20 ammo per blast. All reflected rockets/grenades/arrows will inflict Mini-Crit damage.

My Edited Version

Weapon	Kill Icon	Ammo Information	Damage Range	Notes / Special Abilities
Flamethrower Stock		Fire: Air blasts: Ammo Carried: (same reserve) 200 10 N/A	Base (Max): 139.5 / sec. Crit (Max): 418.5 / sec. Afterburn: 6 / sec. × 10 secs.1	Secondary fire blasts compressed air which knocks back enemies, redirects enemy projectiles, and extinguishes flames on teammates, using 20 ammo per blast. All reflected rockets/grenades/arrows will inflict Mini-Crit damage.

I saw another user trying to talk about a table modification (Vaught)(discussion here) i did like it but i thought i would go a step further and try to reduce some unnecessary things.

• You can notice that the table height is much smaller then before
• The image of the flamethrower has only been reduced by 25% so that it's still visible but reduced table height.
• I have merged the Ammo Loaded and Ammo carried into one table because those 2 can be put into the same general column as seen above.
• Another noticeable edit is the that instead of having the stats shown under one another e.g. the airblasts had the number ten a line under it but this way the number is right next to it and helps in the height reduction..
• The most change that will happen (but least noticeable) if this takes affect is that the wiki pages with these tables will have their size changed a fair bit making the page smaller but with still the same amount of information.

I want as much critique as i can get on this to help the pages improve in tidiness and size to reduce the amount of download the user will have to go through (even though not much it will all add up). I really hope this idea is not frowned apon but i will accept improvement ideas to enhance these table's size and capacity. Lexar 12:36, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

 Agree Hell of a lot better than my design. Now I feel uncredit to team :<. But it's still very good! I support it! --Vaught 22:58, 7 December 2010 (UTC)