Difference between revisions of "Talk:Obtaining Pyro achievements"
LordKelvin (talk | contribs) (→Grammar/redundancy: new section) |
(→Grammar/redundancy) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Stop making the changes to grammar that I've fixed. The reason that I changed it to "him or her" is because it is in reference to ''players'', not the classes themselves. Furthermore, the links that I added are to make it easier for people who want to navigate directly to the achievement that they are having trouble with instead of reading the article from the beginning. --[[User:LordKelvin|LordKelvin]] 01:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | Stop making the changes to grammar that I've fixed. The reason that I changed it to "him or her" is because it is in reference to ''players'', not the classes themselves. Furthermore, the links that I added are to make it easier for people who want to navigate directly to the achievement that they are having trouble with instead of reading the article from the beginning. --[[User:LordKelvin|LordKelvin]] 01:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | : I'm really gonna have to apologize for earlier; I shouldn't have gone through everything so quickly. Anyway, my argument is that most of the sentences refer to the classes themselves, rather than the players behind them. Since the classes are all male (besides Pyro), they should be referred to as such. I know where you're coming from, so I guess we'll just let it be. But, uh, argh, I need to not do grammar fixes at the same time as article edits. Would you be fine if I reinstated the other stuff I did? [[User:InShane|InShane]] 01:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:46, 14 December 2010
Carrying buildings
If anyone can confirm whether or not destroying buildings while an engineer is carrying it counts towards the Arsonist achievement, that would be great! Tribor 04:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Grammar/redundancy
Stop making the changes to grammar that I've fixed. The reason that I changed it to "him or her" is because it is in reference to players, not the classes themselves. Furthermore, the links that I added are to make it easier for people who want to navigate directly to the achievement that they are having trouble with instead of reading the article from the beginning. --LordKelvin 01:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm really gonna have to apologize for earlier; I shouldn't have gone through everything so quickly. Anyway, my argument is that most of the sentences refer to the classes themselves, rather than the players behind them. Since the classes are all male (besides Pyro), they should be referred to as such. I know where you're coming from, so I guess we'll just let it be. But, uh, argh, I need to not do grammar fixes at the same time as article edits. Would you be fine if I reinstated the other stuff I did? InShane 01:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
