Difference between revisions of "Talk:Obtaining Pyro achievements"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Grammar/redundancy)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Lumberjack/Clearcutter ==
 +
I added the text "Alternatively you could try your luck in a melee server" to both but it got deleted previously. Why?
 +
[[User:Lordfa9|Lordfa9]] 20:14, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 +
 
== Carrying buildings ==
 
== Carrying buildings ==
  

Revision as of 20:14, 21 May 2011

Lumberjack/Clearcutter

I added the text "Alternatively you could try your luck in a melee server" to both but it got deleted previously. Why? Lordfa9 20:14, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Carrying buildings

If anyone can confirm whether or not destroying buildings while an engineer is carrying it counts towards the Arsonist achievement, that would be great! Tribor 04:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Grammar/redundancy

Stop making the changes to grammar that I've fixed. The reason that I changed it to "him or her" is because it is in reference to players, not the classes themselves. Furthermore, the links that I added are to make it easier for people who want to navigate directly to the achievement that they are having trouble with instead of reading the article from the beginning. --LordKelvin 01:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm really gonna have to apologize for earlier; I shouldn't have gone through everything so quickly. Anyway, my argument is that most of the sentences refer to the classes themselves, rather than the players behind them. Since the classes are all male (besides Pyro), they should be referred to as such. I know where you're coming from, so I guess we'll just let it be. But, uh, argh, I need to not do grammar fixes at the same time as article edits. Would you be fine if I reinstated the other stuff I did? InShane 01:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Some of the stuff that I added was already a part of the article since before the move to the Official Wiki, I have no idea why some of it was removed. Removing some blatantly redundant stuff is fine, but my position is that more information regarding how to obtain an achievement is better than less. --LordKelvin 01:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Ah, I guess we're opposites there. I'll do my best to keep as much information as possible while shuffling through the achievements for the other classes. InShane 01:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)