User talk:Smashman

Вопрос

Как или за что получить Wiki Cap??--The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kost (talk) • (contribs)

Translation - Question: How or what to get Wiki Cap??

Don't you love Google Translate? Psychopath 14:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

How exceedingly useless. I can't speak Russian. Read this. Google translate if you must. – Smashman _(talk) 21:07, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Particles

Hey, thanks for uploading a better version of my rather crappy GRU skulls. I was just wondering, how exactly did you do it? I know you can do -tools in the launch options to edit/view the particles, but I didn't really see an option to export, etc. Thanks, - LingoSalad _(talk) 21:34, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

I simply extracted the material. – Smashman _(talk) 08:56, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Request for Page Creation

Can me and another user make a new page or pages for the two most popular Zombie Fortress maps, zf_dustbowl and zf_asylum? Lemme know. Thanks -FlaminSarge 07:43, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Stockbroker's Scarf trivia

Hey. I removed that bit of trivia about the scarf because it's pretty obvious from a glance. The trivia guide states 'Trivia should not be a simple observation of the item. If it can be deduced by simply looking at the item, then it is not trivia'. I think this is a pretty clear case of that statement. —Moussekateer·talk 10:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind, it has been welcome back into the fold by popular demand. —Moussekateer·talk 11:02, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

thanks

thanks for fixin' up the worms images. i wasn't quite sure how to make em look...less ugly, one more thing ..do you think the team17 images and such require a category or are they okay as is? HyenaDip 18:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

JAG Bugs

The Jag, despite what is listed on the attrabutes does not, in fact build 30% faster at the current time, and must be patched.

Please add this to know bugs on the JAG page?

OK...I've finally found the time to start on a Map Specific section of the Basic Engineer strategy page...here's the work in progress: Engineer Strategy. I'd like some opinions. Rockn-Roll 08:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Mann Co Store

Heh, I see someone tried to add the Bundle of Bargains too. Sadly the item name is too long for it to successfully register in item_prices/core so it might need to be renamed to Bundle of Bargains or something. I would do it myself but I don't know where the {{Item price}} is stored Sentry 21:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Engineer Strategy with Screenshots

Hey Smashman...Ananath and I were discussing using screenshots for better illustration of engineer strategy so that players can actually see the placement of the buildings instead of relying on vague or confusing descriptions and drawings. You can see the discussion here: http://wiki.teamfortress.com/wiki/Talk:Community_Engineer_strategy

I made a start on it and would like your opinion. I just checked and Moussekateer deleted the pages I created along with my screenshots. I'd rather not just add the content to existing pages and would like to discuss the new pages before linking them in.

Key article

Sorry about the edit... but the festive crate key states that too. Should it be removed too? -- Swordz (talk | contribs) 14:14, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem. Yeah it should be removed. Not really any point in it being there, considering people can just look right a little bit. – Smashman _(talk) 14:16, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Inconsistency clearly not a bug?

Hello, I've seen your edit on the Iron Curtain and Brass Beast pages. Could you explain why a lack of consistency between the first person view model of the several miniguns is not a bug? It doesn't look like something intended. Thanks. Kusuri 17:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Inconsistancy is not bug. It's neither intended nor a bug. It just happened due to c_models. – Smashman _(talk) 17:45, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough, but I still think it's something that needs to be fixed. Kusuri 20:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

It's highly unlikely. Valve are lazy like that. And it's not so bad. It's barely noticeable, and they have better things to work on. – Smashman _(talk) 21:00, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Removing content from talk

We got around to a discussion about this. Individuals are allowed to remove their talk page content without archiving if it is not warning against their conduct (for example, show preview etc.) Forcing people to archive content that will never have a use again is pointless, especially since it's always accessible in page history. -- Pilk _(talk) 17:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Oh ok. Although I did tell him to use a license and categories. – Smashman _(talk) 17:56, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Admin abuse. Daimao 17:58, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Abroooooooooooooooooooose. Sorry, I just had to. -RJs 18:00, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Not abuse. Rule enforcement. So you can be quiet now. – Smashman _(talk) 18:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)