Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of game modes"
(→Medieval) |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Medieval == | == Medieval == | ||
| − | I don't think the medieval section should just be about attack/defend, but about medieval as a whole. | + | I don't think the medieval section should just be about attack/defend, but about medieval as a whole.[[User:Untouch|Untouch]] 04:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:34, 28 December 2010
 | "Now that there was a fine piece 'a work." List of game modes is a featured article candidate. This page has been identified as possibly meeting the featured article criteria. |
I added a bit of information pertaining the subject of the Training mode, if anybody objects to this let me know please. Guy 10:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
So is it taboo to guess at the undeclared gamemode? It seems to me it is going to be hunted from TFC. --The Blueberry Villain 20:57, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Split
I'd like to propose separating each game mode into its own article, for better formatting, and to allow more game mode-specific information to be added. -- Nineaxis 
17:24, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Support: Da, diz vill work. -- OluapPlayer (t) 
17:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)- Support: What he said.--Focusknock 17:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support:
While I see your point, this article in its current state is very comprehensive. I may change my mind, I'll think on it. – Smashman (talk) 17:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Changing my decision to Support. Having a number of articles would mean we could expand them. Go for it! – Smashman (talk) 15:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 
Comment: Perhaps we should create each game mode page, but condense this page and leave it up as a sort of disambiguation for the game modes. --Firestorm 18:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support: Agreed.Every game mode should have its own page so we can put as many info as we want and not mess this page. Mitko1239 14:22, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support: Same as others above. -- Nightbox (t s) 11:54, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: Same as others above, including those who say 'same as others above'. --Underyx 15:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: Can you give an example of something you'd like to add? Right now the only thing I see missing is strategy, and that should stay in it's page IMHO. --CruelCow 14:35, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support: Same as others above, including those who say 'same as others above', including those who say 'Same as others above, including those who say 'same as others above'.'.[] /shadow/sShaD'OhsS 05:20, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support: I agree. I also believe each fan made game mode is compiled into one article. --TheChaosLord977 18:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support: It might help the article by removing the links to the various maps in each section, since they're also listed in each game modes respective page, right? Dragonah 20:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support: Don't see why not. Not going to bother cleaning this page until a decision is made. Vekter 19:31, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support: I like the idea of splitting, it allows us to put more information about each individual game mode in and keeps it readable. Mrnoj 02:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support: A fine idea that I think should work. Dorieku 12:16, 21 November 2010
New Game Mode
So has there been any reports of any information on the new game mode. M-NINJA 22:04, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not yet. -- OluapPlayer (t) 22:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Medieval
I don't think the medieval section should just be about attack/defend, but about medieval as a whole.Untouch 04:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
