Difference between revisions of "Talk:Item quality distribution"
m (Supporting merge proposal) |
(→Merge) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:{{c|Support}} You beat me there. Shock394 18:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC) | :{{c|Support}} You beat me there. Shock394 18:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
:{{c|Support}} Yeah, this merge proposal looks right to me [[User:Cthulhu1992|Cthulhu1992]] 09:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC) | :{{c|Support}} Yeah, this merge proposal looks right to me [[User:Cthulhu1992|Cthulhu1992]] 09:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :{{c|Support}} I agree. [[User:Zoon-li|Zoon-li]] 18:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:41, 7 March 2011
The Rimmed Raincatcher must be updated in this template to denote that it can exist with Unusual quality. This change was added as part of the Febuary 14, 2011 Patch. SnowCanary 17:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Merge
IMHO, we needn't so small article. It will be appropriate to merge it with Quality. These articles have the same theme. - Grand-O-Rand 22:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Support You beat me there. Shock394 18:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)- Support Yeah, this merge proposal looks right to me Cthulhu1992 09:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support I agree. Zoon-li 18:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
