Difference between revisions of "Talk:Medieval Update"
SilverHammer (talk | contribs) m (→News mention: unsigned) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Its featured in the news section. This article should not be deleted. {{unsigned|Ruffmajorkc}} | Its featured in the news section. This article should not be deleted. {{unsigned|Ruffmajorkc}} | ||
| + | : Who's saying it should be deleted? [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 12:43, 27 July 2011 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:43, 27 July 2011
Blog mention
Hi, just wondering, is there any confirmation or source that shows this will be blog mentioned? 
Scatman John
(Talk | Contrib) 17:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- 17:52 - Pie_Tony: better not, has some reveiling things on it
- When asked for a screenshot of the email - Pogo 17:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well that's not very helpful. I think a copy should be saved to your sandbox and this article deleted from the main namespace until it is featured in a blog post. —
Moussekateer·talk 18:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well that's not very helpful. I think a copy should be saved to your sandbox and this article deleted from the main namespace until it is featured in a blog post. —
News mention
Its featured in the news section. This article should not be deleted. {{subst:void|This template should always be substituted. Please change {{Unsigned}} to {{subst:Unsigned}}}}— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ruffmajorkc (talk) • (contribs) 2024-07-23, 12:17 UTC
- Who's saying it should be deleted? Balladofwindfishes 12:43, 27 July 2011 (PDT)
