Difference between revisions of "Talk:Napper's Respite"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Considering some hats aren't paintable, I think it's fair to say it should be mentioned. [[User:UrCa1988|UrCa1988]] 18:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | Considering some hats aren't paintable, I think it's fair to say it should be mentioned. [[User:UrCa1988|UrCa1988]] 18:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | : The list of hats that can be painted are listed [[Paint|here]] so it's not necessary at the moment, we may add that to the infobox --[[User:Firestorm|<font color="#FF6600"><tt><big><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></big></tt></font>]] {{mod}} 18:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:49, 2 October 2010
Is there a reason this page has been full-protected? Seems kinda weird. Water Armpit 04:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Add to trivia that this also has jigglebones, the pom pom on the top bounces with movement. UrCa1988 07:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
^sorry I think its my bad tell me how to fix and I gladly willRpR 10:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- WillRpR: Protecting / Unprotecting pages is a job that only Wiki staff can do. We were protecting pages until the basic structure of the page was in place, to ensure our formatting guidelines are adhered too. The page is unprotected now, you don't need to do anything. :) -RJ 10:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
sorry for the general noobiness RpR 10:31, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Do we really need to say that it's paintable, seeing as a great many hats are, it seems a bit pointless to say it so specifically on this page. Discdeath 17:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Considering some hats aren't paintable, I think it's fair to say it should be mentioned. UrCa1988 18:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
