Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scorch Shot"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Name)
(Weapon Description: new section)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
:{{c|Nope.avi}} No need to change. [[File:Hinaomi-sig.png]] [[User:Hinaomi|Hinaomi]] 13:14, 26 June 2012 (PDT)
 
:{{c|Nope.avi}} No need to change. [[File:Hinaomi-sig.png]] [[User:Hinaomi|Hinaomi]] 13:14, 26 June 2012 (PDT)
 
::When this subject was previously brought up, most users preferred that the "The" should be dropped out of the weapon's names. That's how it has been since. {{n}} [[User:EpicEric|<span style="color:#5885A2;font-size:15px;font-family:'Trebuchet MS';text-shadow:#e3e3e3 1px 1px 0px;"><b>Epic Eric</b></span>]] <small> ([[User talk:EpicEric|T]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/EpicEric|C]])</small> 16:28, 26 June 2012 (PDT)
 
::When this subject was previously brought up, most users preferred that the "The" should be dropped out of the weapon's names. That's how it has been since. {{n}} [[User:EpicEric|<span style="color:#5885A2;font-size:15px;font-family:'Trebuchet MS';text-shadow:#e3e3e3 1px 1px 0px;"><b>Epic Eric</b></span>]] <small> ([[User talk:EpicEric|T]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/EpicEric|C]])</small> 16:28, 26 June 2012 (PDT)
 +
 +
== Weapon Description ==
 +
 +
I'm thinking something like "appears to be an improvised flare gun crudely made from scrap metal parts." Does that seem accurate? Is a more detailed description appropriate? [[User:The Grand Karkasmolen|The Grand Karkasmolen]] 06:42, 27 June 2012 (PDT)

Revision as of 13:42, 27 June 2012

Is this necessary?

If the item is unreleased, why does it require a page? Vide0n 21:54, 21 June 2012 (PDT)

  • Rescinded, just read the latest blog post. :p Vide0n 02:22, 22 June 2012 (PDT)

Name

It's called the scorch shot and I suggest we change the name of the page. Footlesssushi 13:07, 26 June 2012 (PDT)

Pictogram nope.png Nope.avi No need to change. User Hinaomi Hinaomi-sig.png Hinaomi 13:14, 26 June 2012 (PDT)
When this subject was previously brought up, most users preferred that the "The" should be dropped out of the weapon's names. That's how it has been since.  –  Epic Eric (T | C) 16:28, 26 June 2012 (PDT)

Weapon Description

I'm thinking something like "appears to be an improvised flare gun crudely made from scrap metal parts." Does that seem accurate? Is a more detailed description appropriate? The Grand Karkasmolen 06:42, 27 June 2012 (PDT)