Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gentle Munitionne of Leisure"
R4wrz0rz0r (talk | contribs) m (→Marked for deletion?) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Whoever did it was trolling or didnt know what he was doing. They attempted it four times. Im not sure how to remove it without re-building the page, it will get fixed though - [[User:Wolfbane5001|Wolfbane5001]] 12:42, 28 June 2012 (PDT) | *Whoever did it was trolling or didnt know what he was doing. They attempted it four times. Im not sure how to remove it without re-building the page, it will get fixed though - [[User:Wolfbane5001|Wolfbane5001]] 12:42, 28 June 2012 (PDT) | ||
::{{c|+|Feecksed.}} It was referencing the wrong pages, and those deletion tags were not meant to show up here. [[User:R4wrz0rz0r|<span style="background:black;color:white;border:2px solid cyan;font-variant:small-caps;padding:2px">rZ</span>]] 12:49, 28 June 2012 (PDT) | ::{{c|+|Feecksed.}} It was referencing the wrong pages, and those deletion tags were not meant to show up here. [[User:R4wrz0rz0r|<span style="background:black;color:white;border:2px solid cyan;font-variant:small-caps;padding:2px">rZ</span>]] 12:49, 28 June 2012 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Bad Picture == | ||
+ | I am Concerned about the main picture of the frightened heavy, as pose seems irrelevant to the content. can this be changed or explained? | ||
+ | [[User:ColonelGaraffi|ColonelGaraffi]] 14:55, 10 July 2012 (PDT)<ColonelGaraffi> |
Revision as of 21:55, 10 July 2012
Marked for deletion?
...Why? It's still new, it's kind of normal the page is low quality... —BobMathrotus 09:33, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
- Whoever did it was trolling or didnt know what he was doing. They attempted it four times. Im not sure how to remove it without re-building the page, it will get fixed though - Wolfbane5001 12:42, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
- Feecksed. It was referencing the wrong pages, and those deletion tags were not meant to show up here. rZ 12:49, 28 June 2012 (PDT)
Bad Picture
I am Concerned about the main picture of the frightened heavy, as pose seems irrelevant to the content. can this be changed or explained? ColonelGaraffi 14:55, 10 July 2012 (PDT)<ColonelGaraffi>