Difference between revisions of "Team Fortress Wiki talk:Wikichievements"
m (Update icons) |
m (Update icons) |
||
Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
{{Achievement notification | {{Achievement notification | ||
− | | img = Tf win well minimumtime. | + | | img = Tf win well minimumtime.png |
| title = Article Dominatior | | title = Article Dominatior | ||
| text = For those who spent there time cleaning up article making it smooth to read. | | text = For those who spent there time cleaning up article making it smooth to read. |
Revision as of 22:31, 3 September 2012
Contents
- 1 Earn a wiki cap
- 2 Quote
- 3 Wikichievement for contributors to TFC articles
- 4 Haxtinguisher
- 5 Template Blacksmith
- 6 Painful Karma
- 7 Hot Contribution
- 8 Indirect Helper
- 9 Generous Giver
- 10 Question
- 11 Special Field Editer
- 12 The flight from darkness to light
- 13 Some wikichievements I came up with
- 14 My wiki achievement
- 15 It Ain't Rocket Science
- 16 Format
- 17 NO! DONT DO IT!
- 18 New Wikichievements?
- 19 Something I came up with
- 20 A parallel to an existing one
- 21 You gotta be kiddin' me!
- 22 Wikichievception
- 23 Secrets behind success
- 24 Master of Facts
- 25 April Fools?
- 26 Boss Doss Loss Toss Moss Voss
Earn a wiki cap
What it says on the tin. --Stevoisiak 01:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- Nope Getting a Wiki Cap isn't an achievement, but a reward for your valuable contributions. – Epic Eric (T | C) 00:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Quote
“ | I'll put it in my trophy room, with the othas.
Click to listen
— The Scout on his Wiki contributions
|
” |
How about that? -- En Ex (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sweeeet. Update. ~
lhavelund
(talk ▪ contrib) 15:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)- Beautiful--Markd 16:03, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure he said "with the others" and not "with the othas" .. Atlas 14:12, 18 April 2012 (PDT)
- It's his accent... and this discussion is almost a year and a half old =P » Cooper Kid (blether) • (contreebs) 14:15, 18 April 2012 (PDT)
Wikichievement for contributors to TFC articles
I have no ideas for pictures, names or descriptions now, but it makes sense that we provide an incentive for people to work on TFC articles. ~ lhavelund
(talk ▪ contrib) 01:48, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Something like: "The Classy-c Editor : Edit and Update the Team Fortress Classic part of the Wiki" Tturbo (T/C) 16:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Back to the Gold Source age |
Lemme blow some life in to this achievement. TheNobleScout 01:14, 9 January 2012 (PST)
Haxtinguisher
The Haxtinguisher |
With the last incident of someone having used Google Translate, I notice how hard it was to track down the pages and delete them... So an idea for rewarding this work. Tturbo (T/C) 16:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I like dis new chievement. — Wind 00:30, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Template Blacksmith
Template Blacksmith |
I made this one because it would be good for the userbox makers since theres no achievement for making these and alot of the users (including myself) likes to sprite up their userpages. I have another one in mind, but I dont wanna bring it up before you guys are agreed to this Wikichievement. The Noble Scout R9t4 20:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- The Userboxes are a very minor part of a purely aesthetic part of the Wiki. They are hardly worth a Wikichievement (Even though I would get about four of this one right now for my userboxes) -- Firestorm 02:21, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Remember Firestorm that i said userboxes. Which mean no one knows how many userboxes it needs to be, so it means that it must be alot of them. The Noble Scout 17:30, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- These sort of wikichievements shouldn't be encouraged. Creating tons of userboxes doesn't benefit or improve the actual wiki in any way. It's nice to decorate your userpage with them, but we'd much rather spend your time contributing to the wiki instead of creating countless arbitrary userboxes. Sorry :( —Moussekateer·talk 17:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Well, then i'll make a better suggestion later since this one was abit of a failure :S The Noble Scout 18:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Noble Scout is credit to team! The Great Irish Warload 22:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Well, then i'll make a better suggestion later since this one was abit of a failure :S The Noble Scout 18:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- These sort of wikichievements shouldn't be encouraged. Creating tons of userboxes doesn't benefit or improve the actual wiki in any way. It's nice to decorate your userpage with them, but we'd much rather spend your time contributing to the wiki instead of creating countless arbitrary userboxes. Sorry :( —Moussekateer·talk 17:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Remember Firestorm that i said userboxes. Which mean no one knows how many userboxes it needs to be, so it means that it must be alot of them. The Noble Scout 17:30, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Painful Karma
Painful Karma |
I made this one to test a series based on grouping. As in making an article criticized by 2 groups. The first group liking/praising the article, and the second group... eh, not so much. If you don't understand, then basically imagine making an article about a recent TF2 edition. 30 people so far view the article. 15 of them like it and 15 of them don't like it. But more people will probably dislike this Wikichievement than like it :P The Great Irish Warload 00:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- What is this rewarding? Making an article that splits the community or that isn't worth editing? Not a good Wikichievement at all. -- Firestorm 02:21, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- So I guess I was right about this receiving more hate then like :/ The Great Irish Warload 03:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Too easy to get, just making one like Benjamuffin did with Demopan and you are done. The Noble Scout 17:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- So I guess I was right about this receiving more hate then like :/ The Great Irish Warload 03:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Hot Contribution
Hot Contribution |
The thing about this little wikichievement must be on english to make it a competition between the users who makes articles to the TF Wiki. Its a good idea i thought, but i need your meanings and to achieve this it must be either a new item or map etc.... or just what the description says. The Noble Scout 13:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- There's already the Frontier Notice Wikichievement that does that if I remember the description correctly. Tturbo (T/C) 15:07, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, true... The Noble Scout (T/C) 21:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- This would just encourage users to spam and make a useless page. The Wikichievements should not generally have solid requirements or it will emphasize spamming and not being userful. Also, to both of you, please reduce the size of your signatures, there's no reason for them to take up so much room -- Firestorm 21:37, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, true... The Noble Scout (T/C) 21:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Indirect Helper
Indirect Helper |
For those who'd rather help other users and teach them how they can contribute positively to the Wiki. The title/text may not be clear, so those can be modified later. – Epic Eric (T | C) 00:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- I Like this wikichievement, something that Recruiter doesn't count. But another name would make it even more awesome. Tturbo (T/C) 01:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
What about:
Helping Hand |
– Epic Eric (T | C) 18:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Better... Get other staff approval and it could be added. Tturbo (T/C) 21:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Support Is good, I fixed a typo in the suggestion too. -- Firestorm 02:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Totally support this. What good is a new user if they have no idea what they are doing. --Stevoisiak 23:14, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support I approve of indirect helping. As Stevoisiak said, it isn't very good when a new user doesn't know what to do. – Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 00:11, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Generous Giver
Generous Giver |
I'm not sure about the description. But this could be useful for those who'd like to give out things. GeminiViRiS Talk · Contribs 23:13, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see how this is related with the Wiki. – Epic Eric (T | C) 23:27, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I want this to be real.... I give away stuff all the time, lol --Stevoisiak 02:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Me too, there are some wiki users that really deserve it – Ohyeahcrucz[T][C] 02:17, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- I want this to be real.... I give away stuff all the time, lol --Stevoisiak 02:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with EpicEric. If there were achievements for general purposes, this would be worthy. Alas, these are wikiachievements, and strictly wiki related. --Nihilus0(contribs) 02:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Oppose I see no purpose in this. It's not contributing to the Wiki to give away stuff -- Firestorm 02:26, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Nope Why doing that, it will be very generous by others to get and give stuff, but how can you relate Wiki workers to this one, GeminiViRiS? The Noble Scout (T/C) 08:15, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, yes, silly me for not making an achievement not relating to the Wiki. But I thought I'd throw an idea out here for the community of the Wiki. See, in the IRC chat, some folks are clamoring that they don't have "X" game for pack "Y". Whether they're cheap or can't afford it, it's always nice to give rather than receive. —GeminiViRiS Talk · Contribs
- Nope Why doing that, it will be very generous by others to get and give stuff, but how can you relate Wiki workers to this one, GeminiViRiS? The Noble Scout (T/C) 08:15, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Question
How do you determine who deserved achievement, and who's not?-- ( |) 07:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Please improve the "who deserved achievement" part and I might be able to answer your question. The Great Irish Warload 03:46, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Special Field Editer
Special Field Editer |
Well, since ive failed in my other Wikichievement stuff, maybe i should contribute this one; the point in this was to be to the editors who works in a spesific section all the time. Take me for example. Im working mostly on the Hats section on the Norwegian Wiki Part. Its just an idea and i dont think it would be any good but at leaset worth a shot. The Noble Scout (T/C) 18:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
The flight from darkness to light
What about:
The flight from darkness to light |
--Nik9990 Talk | Cont 14:04, 27 July 2011 (PDT)
- The biggest wikichievement ever. So Support - Grand-O-Rand · (Talk) 14:06, 27 July 2011 (PDT)
- Comment Seems really broad. Might be best to split it into two. One for helping beginners, one for defending the rules. -- Firestorm 16:09, 1 August 2011 (PDT)
Some wikichievements I came up with
The Trivia Remover |
- I know it's a bad name for it but I'm horrible at naming things.
- Anyway I've seen people removing those pointless trivia in the recent log all the time so I made this. If that isn't good I made another one.
Article Dominatior |
Again bad with the naming but award to those who cleaned up article making it easy to read. Violencejr123 21:52, 2 August 2011 (PDT)
- Support I like them, but do you think we could somehow combine the two? To me, they're both about cleaning up the pages, just more specific. 21:55, 2 August 2011 (PDT)
- Hmm I will see. Violencejr123 21:58, 2 August 2011 (PDT)
64px |
Article Dominatior |
- Well I was thinking of just keeping this one since taking out trivia is cleaning up an article like you said. Violencejr123 08:41, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
- Still Support I like it. I just have one last suggestion, maybe the use scout achievement "Round tripper" icon? 15:31, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
- Done. Violencejr123 15:36, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
My wiki achievement
Can I put "code" on my own talk page? --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Qror (talk)
- No. It's supposed to be awarded to others, not yourself. – Epic Eric (T | C) 18:40, 11 August 2011 (PDT)
It Ain't Rocket Science
It Ain't Rocket Science |
Reword description if you want. I basically want this to be for those who end up providing more help on a topic then the tutorial that was made for that area. e.g. i found the painted hat variants tutorial a little confusing, another user who has done it before, goes through and helps step by step with a successful result. - Lexar - talk 03:24, 18 August 2011 (PDT)
Format
Videographer |
I might be nitpicking here, but can the colour of the link be changed? It's not very easy to read so looks a bit tacky. There's also a full-stop missing! How could dis happen?
» Cooper Kid (blether·contreebs) 02:15, 30 August 2011 (PDT)
- I think that if the link was the same green color as the Wikichievement title, it'd look pretty nice. Just my two cents. Sven 08:55, 11 September 2011 (PDT)
NO! DONT DO IT!
Don't you readd! |
This was inspired by those users who have been adding files that currently exists. Im not going to metion names. The Noble Scout (T/C) 08:14, 11 September 2011 (PDT)
- Change the title to "Don't" instead of "Dont" and then we'll talk. Sven 08:57, 11 September 2011 (PDT)
- Done :D The Noble Scout (T/C) 09:04, 11 September 2011 (PDT)
- :D Good, now let's talk about it. I like the basic idea, but it seems (at least to me) that it could be better somehow. No idea HOW, but still. I like the idea and hope you get some more feedback/support for this soon(ish). Sven 09:07, 11 September 2011 (PDT)
New Wikichievements?
64px |
Wiki Crime and Punishment |
Classic Editing |
Meet the Fraud |
Happy Birthday |
We Can Fix It In Post |
Ready For Duty |
Relentless Editing |
-- ScoutKast 01:12, 23 September 2011 (PDT)
- I dislike Ready for Duty. We already have a good one for that, known as Show me Your War Face! I don't think that blocking someone is good either, but the rest sound good. Fyahweather 13:29, 23 September 2011 (PDT)
- Why, Thank You! Your right though, "Show Me Your War Face" is pretty much the same. -- ScoutKast 14:23, 23 September 2011 (PDT)
- Out of all of these, "We can fix it in post" is really the only achievement worth implementing. The others are either far too simple (Classic Editing) or they promote something we don't want (Wiki crime and punishment). -- Firestorm 15:58, 23 September 2011 (PDT)
- Coool. Making a new Wikichievement is my new goal now, i'll keep thinking of some more. I'll try to avoid things that are too easy or promote something bad. -- ScoutKast 04:21, 24 September 2011 (PDT)
- I think we could come up with a better name than "We Can Fix It In Post" though. -- ScoutKast 00:44, 26 September 2011 (PDT)
- Coool. Making a new Wikichievement is my new goal now, i'll keep thinking of some more. I'll try to avoid things that are too easy or promote something bad. -- ScoutKast 04:21, 24 September 2011 (PDT)
- Out of all of these, "We can fix it in post" is really the only achievement worth implementing. The others are either far too simple (Classic Editing) or they promote something we don't want (Wiki crime and punishment). -- Firestorm 15:58, 23 September 2011 (PDT)
- Why, Thank You! Your right though, "Show Me Your War Face" is pretty much the same. -- ScoutKast 14:23, 23 September 2011 (PDT)
Lights, Camera, Action! |
-- ScoutKast 00:39, 27 September 2011 (PDT)
- My agreements: 1st one: Mods and Admins takes care of this.
2nd one: TFC is standard stuff, no need to edit it unless someone has screwed up.
3rd one: TF2Items is sure a usefull place to check peoples BP's
4th: Neutral
5th: No need to push the users who makes these Demonstrations
6th: Already exsist XD
7th: Just make a bunch of edits and upload them and there you got it...No need
8th: These demonstrations are viewed before they are uploaded by the Wiki's Youtube Channel.
TheNobleScout 00:26, 24 October 2011 (PDT)
- You're just jealous-- ScoutKast 20:09, 26 October 2011 (PDT)
Something I came up with
Gigantic Improvement
An Overkill Cure |
Value of Teamwork
Master Plan |
Something like that? :D Limie Pie 06:30, 30 September 2011 (PDT)
- The first one seems abit unachieveable because you got to redo a HUUUUUGE article. From my point of view, it's not a wikichievement, but a goal. The second one on the other hand is a co-op achievement...Look around! We do this everyday! You should go and give every user this wikichevement then XD TheNobleScout 00:29, 24 October 2011 (PDT)
A parallel to an existing one
Bug Spray |
I feel that now we are beginning to subject bugs to harsher levels of scrutiny like trivia, a similar wikichievement should be in place. -Mr. Magoolachub 10:37, 7 December 2011 (PST)
You gotta be kiddin' me!
The Wikichievements are OverPowered. I can't Farm these Achievements. Every other Achievement is a piece-a-piss, but these actually require me to put work in. What gives, man? [UGS 2nd]Lancer @nti-tank Rocket 04:29, 18 December 2011 (PST)
- I lol'd. SS2R 04:30, 18 December 2011 (PST)
Wikichievception
64px |
Wikichievception |
Eh? Eh? EH?
64px |
Model Mayhem |
I don't think I saw this one anywhere, I'm sure many people are deserving of it.
True Wiki Goer |
Just some random thoughts. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nocturne (talk) • (contribs)
- The 3D model one exists as the 3D Wizard wikichievement. —Moussekateer·talk 15:18, 14 February 2012 (PST)
- Oops, I completly neglected the actual project page, haha. Nocturne 15:32, 14 February 2012 (PST)
Secrets behind success
The Secrets Behind Success |
Lockon 14:57, 14 February 2012 (PST)Lockon
- This sounds like the Helping Hand wikichievement? With an extra criteria added on. —Moussekateer·talk 15:18, 14 February 2012 (PST)
Master of Facts
The Master of Fact |
Lockon 14:57, 14 February 2012 (PST)Lockon
Trivia Inquisition is related to this kind of wikichievement TheNobleScout 10:05, 17 February 2012 (PST)
April Fools?
Frivolous Fooler |
Limeaide 05:24, 5 August 2012 (PDT)
Boss Doss Loss Toss Moss Voss
Science got done |
I've never seen any achievements for people who has helped other people by guiding and giving tips and feedback on how a editor/translator contributes. There's just too little credit back too, so instead of a "thank you" why not a little wikichievement? TNS 11:38, 11 August 2012 (PDT)