Difference between revisions of "Talk:War Pig"
(→Paint Colors: new section) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Does this take up any more equip regions (e.g. "face") when the bandana style is enabled? I can foresee some pretty serious clipping issues if not... {{User:Cooper Kid/Signature}} 15:40, 7 September 2012 (PDT) | Does this take up any more equip regions (e.g. "face") when the bandana style is enabled? I can foresee some pretty serious clipping issues if not... {{User:Cooper Kid/Signature}} 15:40, 7 September 2012 (PDT) | ||
:Appears to only contain the default hat region, so yeah, there will be some severe clipping with all face-based miscs. I don't see how you'd set different equip regions with styles, or even the point to, since switching styles without re-entering the equip dialog would allow the conflict anyway. [[User:The Riet|The Riet]] 17:02, 8 September 2012 (PDT) | :Appears to only contain the default hat region, so yeah, there will be some severe clipping with all face-based miscs. I don't see how you'd set different equip regions with styles, or even the point to, since switching styles without re-entering the equip dialog would allow the conflict anyway. [[User:The Riet|The Riet]] 17:02, 8 September 2012 (PDT) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Paint Colors == | == Paint Colors == |
Revision as of 04:26, 9 September 2012
Equip Regions
Does this take up any more equip regions (e.g. "face") when the bandana style is enabled? I can foresee some pretty serious clipping issues if not... » Cooper Kid (blether) • (contreebs) 15:40, 7 September 2012 (PDT)
- Appears to only contain the default hat region, so yeah, there will be some severe clipping with all face-based miscs. I don't see how you'd set different equip regions with styles, or even the point to, since switching styles without re-entering the equip dialog would allow the conflict anyway. The Riet 17:02, 8 September 2012 (PDT)
Paint Colors
For the Conspicuous style, A Mann's Mint and Zepheniah's Greed look the same. Is that supposed to be the case? Or is it just a little mistake?BloonZ 21:25, 8 September 2012 (PDT)