Difference between revisions of "User talk:EpicEric"
(→Re: list of dominant weapons) |
(→Re: list of dominant weapons) |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
I noticed that you deleted the page I contributed. Are there guidelines anywhere for notability? I agree that some of the cases listed were a rather specific, but I would consider at least the first few to be worth mentioning - they're interesting from a game balance point of view. [[User:Kzig|Kzig]] 11:37, 15 December 2012 (PST) | I noticed that you deleted the page I contributed. Are there guidelines anywhere for notability? I agree that some of the cases listed were a rather specific, but I would consider at least the first few to be worth mentioning - they're interesting from a game balance point of view. [[User:Kzig|Kzig]] 11:37, 15 December 2012 (PST) | ||
:'''The points in each weapon, if they are better than the default ones, are (or should be) noted in the community strategy pages. Which means all this information already exists in the Wiki, and an additional article for this information is not necessary. Plus, this information is mostly subjective and the terms used (eg. dominant weapon) are unknown to the community.''' {{n}} [[User:EpicEric|<span style="color:#5885A2;font-size:15px;font-family:'Trebuchet MS';text-shadow:#e3e3e3 1px 1px 0px;"><b>Epic Eric</b></span>]] <small> ([[User talk:EpicEric|T]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/EpicEric|C]])</small> 11:45, 15 December 2012 (PST) | :'''The points in each weapon, if they are better than the default ones, are (or should be) noted in the community strategy pages. Which means all this information already exists in the Wiki, and an additional article for this information is not necessary. Plus, this information is mostly subjective and the terms used (eg. dominant weapon) are unknown to the community.''' {{n}} [[User:EpicEric|<span style="color:#5885A2;font-size:15px;font-family:'Trebuchet MS';text-shadow:#e3e3e3 1px 1px 0px;"><b>Epic Eric</b></span>]] <small> ([[User talk:EpicEric|T]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/EpicEric|C]])</small> 11:45, 15 December 2012 (PST) | ||
+ | ::I don't see what was obscure or subjective about stating a simple logical definition and applying it to the numbers at hand, but the clarification re duplication is appreciated. To some extent this seems to be tolerated, e.g. with weapon stats appearing both on [[weapons]] and individual weapon pages, but clearly this was a list too far. Goodnight [[User:Kzig|Kzig]] 15:46, 15 December 2012 (PST) |
Revision as of 23:46, 15 December 2012
If you want to ask me something or discuss anything with me, feel free to post it below! And try to avoid using bold, because I'll use it to answer you if I need to.
Re: {{w}}
I already know dis, stoopid it's on my bookmarks bar rZ 13:54, 25 October 2012 (PDT)
thanks for the help :D
thanks for the warning no more google translator Hardcell 11:54, 23 November 2012 (PST)
Sorry.
Hey,
I'm sorry about breaking that template. And that cache thing explains why it looked broken even when I restored it back to original version at one point. But thanks for pointing this out, I'll remember to use this purge thing next time.
-Asplode 03:31, 26 November 2012 (PST)
My dyk addition
I wasnt sure if it was a GOOD fact, does it match the rules, not is the fact actually true. I just poorly worded the summary, stupid me, TheGuy299 08:02, 26 November 2012 (PST)
- Well, if it is true indeed, then it's a good fact. Also, a link with proof would be greatly appreciated. – Epic Eric (T | C) 08:06, 26 November 2012 (PST)
Item infobox
Im curious as to how you feel that a user sub-page differs from a user page given that they're in the name-space. How is {{User infobox}}
an adequate replacement in any case? i-ghost 15:05, 26 November 2012 (PST)
A question pertaining to the current Did you Know facts.
Can you tell me why the second fact in the Did you Know facts is still there? There is absolutely no proof that it happened. RED Mart Security 14:23, 4 December 2012 (PST)
Golden Botkiller Models
Hi, do you know how to let the Golden Botkiller weapons show up in HLMV. Golden Wrench say something about discription template.
But i'm not exactly sure where to place it. SuperNova123 07:47, 5 December 2012 (PST)
- Sorry, I have no idea how to do this. I'm not completely familiar with HLMV and I don't know how to do such a thing. – Epic Eric (T | C) 07:50, 5 December 2012 (PST)
- It's seems like these two users i have tried to get contact with just ignore my talk message regarding how, User_talk:I-ghost and one named Ragnar. Can you please remind them to check there text book, also how do i get into the IRC since it appears somewhat down. SuperNova123 09:26, 11 December 2012 (PST)
- They may be busy with something else, I don't know, but they've probably have seen your message already. Anyway, the IRC channel is fine and running; see here for info and click the "Chat Now!" button when you're ready to join it. – Epic Eric (T | C) 09:38, 11 December 2012 (PST)
- This is absurd, from time to time they edit stuff but responding my question is never gonna happend, also i can't connect to the IRC chat because of some error log-in show up when i try. I'm sure they have enough leisure time to respond on my talk page. SuperNova123 03:01, 13 December 2012 (PST)
- They may be busy with something else, I don't know, but they've probably have seen your message already. Anyway, the IRC channel is fine and running; see here for info and click the "Chat Now!" button when you're ready to join it. – Epic Eric (T | C) 09:38, 11 December 2012 (PST)
- It's seems like these two users i have tried to get contact with just ignore my talk message regarding how, User_talk:I-ghost and one named Ragnar. Can you please remind them to check there text book, also how do i get into the IRC since it appears somewhat down. SuperNova123 09:26, 11 December 2012 (PST)
Re: list of dominant weapons
I noticed that you deleted the page I contributed. Are there guidelines anywhere for notability? I agree that some of the cases listed were a rather specific, but I would consider at least the first few to be worth mentioning - they're interesting from a game balance point of view. Kzig 11:37, 15 December 2012 (PST)
- The points in each weapon, if they are better than the default ones, are (or should be) noted in the community strategy pages. Which means all this information already exists in the Wiki, and an additional article for this information is not necessary. Plus, this information is mostly subjective and the terms used (eg. dominant weapon) are unknown to the community. – Epic Eric (T | C) 11:45, 15 December 2012 (PST)
- I don't see what was obscure or subjective about stating a simple logical definition and applying it to the numbers at hand, but the clarification re duplication is appreciated. To some extent this seems to be tolerated, e.g. with weapon stats appearing both on weapons and individual weapon pages, but clearly this was a list too far. Goodnight Kzig 15:46, 15 December 2012 (PST)