Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Infobox templates"
(→Sorting out these infoboxes) |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*{{c|approve}} I stated this earlier and I think it should occur. {{n}}[[User:Smashman|<span class="bur">Smashman</span>]]<sub> ([[User_talk:Smashman|talk]])</sub> {{bur}} 18:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC) | *{{c|approve}} I stated this earlier and I think it should occur. {{n}}[[User:Smashman|<span class="bur">Smashman</span>]]<sub> ([[User_talk:Smashman|talk]])</sub> {{bur}} 18:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
*{{c|support}} For the same reason Smashman points out. ~ <code>[[User:Lhavelund|<font color=red><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">'''lhavelund'''</span></font>]]</code> <sup>([[User_talk:lhavelund|talk]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/lhavelund|contrib]])</sup> 00:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC) | *{{c|support}} For the same reason Smashman points out. ~ <code>[[User:Lhavelund|<font color=red><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">'''lhavelund'''</span></font>]]</code> <sup>([[User_talk:lhavelund|talk]] ▪ [[Special:Contributions/lhavelund|contrib]])</sup> 00:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | *{{c|approve}} Some items may have a lot of similarities, and yes, separate infoboxes are complicated to update them all. [[User:Shock394|Shock394]] 03:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:''Discussion started 21/10/10. Discussion will end 28/10/10. (1 week).''-[[User:RJackson|<span style="background-color:#FF0000;color:white;font-size:0.7em;padding: 0 2px;">RJ</span>]]{{mod}} 16:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC) | :''Discussion started 21/10/10. Discussion will end 28/10/10. (1 week).''-[[User:RJackson|<span style="background-color:#FF0000;color:white;font-size:0.7em;padding: 0 2px;">RJ</span>]]{{mod}} 16:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:12, 24 October 2010
Sorting out these infoboxes
Quoting my to-do list:
Comment We have fragmented infoboxes that are shared among items (hat infobox being used for misc items)... one central infobox or truly seperate infoboxes need to be implemented.
I believe it's time to get started with this. I want this discussion to be used to decide which approach we should take for infoboxes: An individual infobox for each type of item OR A global infobox.
Stick your arguments for / against below, use 
Approve or 
Oppose to label the context of your comment under each section:
I'm trying to keep neutral in this discussion, so I'll just add some example opinions on each as I think of them.
RJ 16:53, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Individual infoboxes
- Oppose Individual infoboxes would be a pain to update if there's an item-wide attribute change. -RJ 16:53, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Global infobox
- Approve Only one place to edit global attribute changes. All the attributes for items would have to be within the item's article - no infobox defaults.
- Approve I stated this earlier and I think it should occur. – Smashman (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support For the same reason Smashman points out. ~
lhavelund(talk ▪ contrib) 00:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC) - Approve Some items may have a lot of similarities, and yes, separate infoboxes are complicated to update them all. Shock394 03:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Discussion started 21/10/10. Discussion will end 28/10/10. (1 week).-RJ 16:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
