Difference between revisions of "Talk:Backstab"
(→Major Article Revision) |
(→Major Article Revision: Response.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I have reorganized the sections, added a new section, and added a picture to the article. Any comments to the changes? Anything that should be added or removed? ----- [[User:Davtwan|Davtwan]] 03:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC) | I have reorganized the sections, added a new section, and added a picture to the article. Any comments to the changes? Anything that should be added or removed? ----- [[User:Davtwan|Davtwan]] 03:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Moving the section was a good idea, nevertheless your new section was moved to Spy Strategies because it was correct but didn't belonged here, and I really don't see the use of the picture, it's not really that useful, and I don't think it's well done (but that's a minor thing in comparaison). I don't understand your point in wanting at all cost to change this well done article? It doesn't need major revision, not even minor, it's a good one, why change it? [[User:Tturbo|Tturbo]] 04:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC) | :Moving the section was a good idea, nevertheless your new section was moved to Spy Strategies because it was correct but didn't belonged here, and I really don't see the use of the picture, it's not really that useful, and I don't think it's well done (but that's a minor thing in comparaison). I don't understand your point in wanting at all cost to change this well done article? It doesn't need major revision, not even minor, it's a good one, why change it? [[User:Tturbo|Tturbo]] 04:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Because it is being considered to be a featured article. One of the people in charge of featured articles suggested a few changes to be done, so I thought I would help add these changes to make the article a featured one. Mind you though, I'm ''not'' going to remove anything. The content is fine as it is. I just want to give it more content and meat. ----- [[User:Davtwan|Davtwan]] 17:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:30, 25 October 2010
Major Article Revision
I have reorganized the sections, added a new section, and added a picture to the article. Any comments to the changes? Anything that should be added or removed? ----- Davtwan 03:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Moving the section was a good idea, nevertheless your new section was moved to Spy Strategies because it was correct but didn't belonged here, and I really don't see the use of the picture, it's not really that useful, and I don't think it's well done (but that's a minor thing in comparaison). I don't understand your point in wanting at all cost to change this well done article? It doesn't need major revision, not even minor, it's a good one, why change it? Tturbo 04:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Because it is being considered to be a featured article. One of the people in charge of featured articles suggested a few changes to be done, so I thought I would help add these changes to make the article a featured one. Mind you though, I'm not going to remove anything. The content is fine as it is. I just want to give it more content and meat. ----- Davtwan 17:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
