Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conjurer's Cowl"
(→Uncraft Version: new section) |
(→Uncraft Version) |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
I was just wondering if it should be put in there how an uncraftable version was obtained since one exists. [[User:Legomaster445|Legomaster445]] ([[User talk:Legomaster445|talk]]) 20:03, 11 April 2014 (PDT) | I was just wondering if it should be put in there how an uncraftable version was obtained since one exists. [[User:Legomaster445|Legomaster445]] ([[User talk:Legomaster445|talk]]) 20:03, 11 April 2014 (PDT) | ||
+ | : No, we don't list those at all. Notice how other pages don't list "Uncraftable" versions or odd versions of items. Same thing applies. We don't list them. [[User:Ashes|Ashes]] ([[User talk:Ashes|talk]]) 20:13, 11 April 2014 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 03:13, 12 April 2014
Contents
Paintable?
Is it paintable or not? I need proof. – Epic Eric (T | C) 00:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- The API says it isn't, so I guess not. – Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 00:54, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Well, ballad's pic on the IRC channel says otherwise. :P – Epic Eric (T | C) 00:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- But Alex2539's pic proves me wrong. Okay, I'll remove all the paint stuff. – Epic Eric (T | C) 01:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- The hat does have painting textures though. Maybe Valve will just make it paintable through an update to the schema. – Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 01:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, having support for and being actually paintable are two different things. It's controlled by a paintable flag in the capabilities field of items_game/GetSchema. If that's not set, the game won't allow you to select the item in the paint selection dialogue. ~ Ath (talk) 01:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Should we list "has paintable textures, but they are not used" as a bug? Balladofwindfishes 16:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- That sounds logical. It sounds like Valve was just lazy and didn't make it paintable. I bet a future patch will fix that. Just a Gigolo - (talk) 19:06, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- It's not a bug, Valve just simply haven't flagged it as paintable. It's happened before with the Potato hat. They'll probably make it paintable in a Schema update when they remove the untradable flag. ~ Ath (talk) 02:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- It's not a bug but it's trivia worthy methinks. —Moussekateer·talk 02:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- It's not a bug, Valve just simply haven't flagged it as paintable. It's happened before with the Potato hat. They'll probably make it paintable in a Schema update when they remove the untradable flag. ~ Ath (talk) 02:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- That sounds logical. It sounds like Valve was just lazy and didn't make it paintable. I bet a future patch will fix that. Just a Gigolo - (talk) 19:06, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Should we list "has paintable textures, but they are not used" as a bug? Balladofwindfishes 16:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, having support for and being actually paintable are two different things. It's controlled by a paintable flag in the capabilities field of items_game/GetSchema. If that's not set, the game won't allow you to select the item in the paint selection dialogue. ~ Ath (talk) 01:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- The hat does have painting textures though. Maybe Valve will just make it paintable through an update to the schema. – Ohyeahcrucz [T][C] 01:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- But Alex2539's pic proves me wrong. Okay, I'll remove all the paint stuff. – Epic Eric (T | C) 01:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Well, ballad's pic on the IRC channel says otherwise. :P – Epic Eric (T | C) 00:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Reference Link?
Description is likely a reference to a troll text by BloodNinja.
WARNING! MATURE CONTENT! http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/bloodninja
Did not include link due to content. Is there a way to add a link with a content warning upon leaving the wiki? Piogre 01:01, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
It seems encyclopedic enough to include. The content of this wiki is mature by extension from the content of the game... --Minwu 01:27, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Know your meme may provide a bit more info for this, and considering you have the dilemma with the spy and scout's mom, the content is about the same. --EvilDeadFan 01:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- They love memes in Magicka, so it's probably based on that. Just a Gigolo - (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oops, thought the link was to the Know your meme article. Yeah, the current in-article reference is good enough. Minwu 23:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Know your meme may provide a bit more info for this, and considering you have the dilemma with the spy and scout's mom, the content is about the same. --EvilDeadFan 01:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Buy dlc-Magicka and play?
Just thought that i could buy magicka for 1$ then wait and then sell it for profit. Is it possible to buy that without having the game? Can you play with the dlc alone? Why i ask you that? I travel now and will be offline for 3h xD godlike11219
- You have to have the game to buy DLC. It's an awesome game, just buy it. Just a Gigolo - (talk) 09:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Painted variants section.
Its stuffed up for me. Just shows the file names. Is this the case for anyone else?Pierow 22:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
- Paint pics haven't been uploaded yet. But I'm working on them, so no one else do them :3 seb26 22:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
- just as I boot up source sdk :( Noskap 04:27, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Uncraft Version
I was just wondering if it should be put in there how an uncraftable version was obtained since one exists. Legomaster445 (talk) 20:03, 11 April 2014 (PDT)