Difference between revisions of "Talk:Control point timing"
(→Merge with map articles?) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | == Clarify the cap on the bonus for additional cappers? == | ||
+ | The article states that the bonus to cap-speed is down to a harmonic progression; and lists the bonus up to 32 players; but the map-specific examples all stop at 4. Is this a matter of convenient layout; or is there a hard-cap in place that isn't mentioned? | ||
+ | [[User:Ace42|Ace42]] ([[User talk:Ace42|talk]]) 10:13, 9 June 2014 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
== Merge with map articles? == | == Merge with map articles? == | ||
I believe we should put this information in the individual map articles in an easy to read format. Anyone agree? [[User:ApertureScienceAI|ApertureScienceAI]] 13:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC) | I believe we should put this information in the individual map articles in an easy to read format. Anyone agree? [[User:ApertureScienceAI|ApertureScienceAI]] 13:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
:They are... -- [[User:Pilk|Pilk]] <sub>([[User talk:Pilk|talk]])</sub> 13:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC) | :They are... -- [[User:Pilk|Pilk]] <sub>([[User talk:Pilk|talk]])</sub> 13:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:13, 9 June 2014
Clarify the cap on the bonus for additional cappers?
The article states that the bonus to cap-speed is down to a harmonic progression; and lists the bonus up to 32 players; but the map-specific examples all stop at 4. Is this a matter of convenient layout; or is there a hard-cap in place that isn't mentioned? Ace42 (talk) 10:13, 9 June 2014 (PDT)
Merge with map articles?
I believe we should put this information in the individual map articles in an easy to read format. Anyone agree? ApertureScienceAI 13:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)