Difference between revisions of "Talk:Limited Quantity"
m (→Incorpating into another page: Response.) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:I think this should be kept as a separate page, and only remove the category and qualities box, since this is a tag, not a new quality. [[User:Dongparty|Dongparty]] ([[User talk:Dongparty|talk]]) 22:06, 19 September 2014 (PDT) | :I think this should be kept as a separate page, and only remove the category and qualities box, since this is a tag, not a new quality. [[User:Dongparty|Dongparty]] ([[User talk:Dongparty|talk]]) 22:06, 19 September 2014 (PDT) | ||
:: The fact that it is only a tag is why we don't really think we need a page for it. It's such a minor thing that it would be better suited to being on the Items page. And as you said, it's not a new quality, which do all have their own individual pages. Also, Darkid: We can't really have it replace the 'retired' tag, as none of the items that were retired were marked as limited. Valve did a pretty weird selection, considering that the update did pretty much describe the retired hats. --[[User:Omolong|Omolong]] ([[User talk:Omolong|talk]]) 05:43, 20 September 2014 (PDT) | :: The fact that it is only a tag is why we don't really think we need a page for it. It's such a minor thing that it would be better suited to being on the Items page. And as you said, it's not a new quality, which do all have their own individual pages. Also, Darkid: We can't really have it replace the 'retired' tag, as none of the items that were retired were marked as limited. Valve did a pretty weird selection, considering that the update did pretty much describe the retired hats. --[[User:Omolong|Omolong]] ([[User talk:Omolong|talk]]) 05:43, 20 September 2014 (PDT) | ||
| + | :::Pretty sure it's because you can still get (four of the) retired hats from their respective crates. Maybe they forgot to add the tag to the other three hats. - [[User:Dongparty|Dongparty]] ([[User talk:Dongparty|talk]]) 09:42, 20 September 2014 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:42, 20 September 2014
Incorpating into another page
As the title states, I believe we should merge the contents of this page onto another page as there is not enough information to warrant having its own page. Also stating, that all this "Limited Quantity" stuff really does is just add an additional tag. Its extremely minor and probably should be merged onto say the Items page. Thoughts? Ashes (talk) 07:41, 19 September 2014 (PDT)
Support - Nothing much to say, as you've explained the reason already. 
▪ 
- 
08:41, 19 September 2014 (PDT)- Support. Yeah as I said on the IRC, it'd fit better on the items page. It just depends on how we incorporate it into that page. No matter what happens though, I think we should use a template to show what items are set as limited, such as what I've done here. --Omolong (talk) 09:05, 19 September 2014 (PDT)
- Compare this to an item quality. Each quality is a functionally different item, they have different obtain methods, but limited quantity is simply a descriptor. I feel this should replace our previous 'retired' tag for hats. () Darkid (Talk | Contribs) 09:09, 19 September 2014 (PDT)
- I think this should be kept as a separate page, and only remove the category and qualities box, since this is a tag, not a new quality. Dongparty (talk) 22:06, 19 September 2014 (PDT)
- The fact that it is only a tag is why we don't really think we need a page for it. It's such a minor thing that it would be better suited to being on the Items page. And as you said, it's not a new quality, which do all have their own individual pages. Also, Darkid: We can't really have it replace the 'retired' tag, as none of the items that were retired were marked as limited. Valve did a pretty weird selection, considering that the update did pretty much describe the retired hats. --Omolong (talk) 05:43, 20 September 2014 (PDT)
