Difference between revisions of "Talk:Black Knight's Bascinet"
(→Potential Trivia: new section) |
(→Potential Trivia: forgot to sign) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Potential Trivia == | == Potential Trivia == | ||
| − | I was looking through the page hsitory and saw rejected trivia, which claimed The Black Knight was a Monty Python characters, which isn't wrong, but The Black Knight is a stock character in Medival Films. Before you reject my idea, "The Hat with No Name" has similar Trivia on how ot is a stock character for Western Films. (If this gets rejected by Omolong, I'll eat my hair) | + | I was looking through the page hsitory and saw rejected trivia, which claimed The Black Knight was a Monty Python characters, which isn't wrong, but The Black Knight is a stock character in Medival Films. Before you reject my idea, "The Hat with No Name" has similar Trivia on how ot is a stock character for Western Films. (If this gets rejected by Omolong, I'll eat my hair) [[User:ScottishDrunkard|ScottishDrunkard]] ([[User talk:ScottishDrunkard|talk]]) 08:51, 28 February 2015 (PST) |
Revision as of 16:51, 28 February 2015
Potential Trivia
I was looking through the page hsitory and saw rejected trivia, which claimed The Black Knight was a Monty Python characters, which isn't wrong, but The Black Knight is a stock character in Medival Films. Before you reject my idea, "The Hat with No Name" has similar Trivia on how ot is a stock character for Western Films. (If this gets rejected by Omolong, I'll eat my hair) ScottishDrunkard (talk) 08:51, 28 February 2015 (PST)
