Difference between revisions of "Team Fortress Wiki:Archived discussions/Talk:Collis"
Kurathedog (talk | contribs) (→Marked for Deletion Discussion) |
Kurathedog (talk | contribs) (→Marked for Deletion Discussion: derp sign. Need more practice :P) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{c|Oppose}} The map was recently used in the ETF2L Monday Night Madness cup, [http://etf2l.org/2010/10/23/mnm-6-announcement/ ] - clearly far from unheard of this side of the pond. Plus there are a (no offense to the map's authors) [[Moonshine|couple]] [[Atrophy (Capture the Flag)|of]] [[Deliverance|maps]] I've never heard of, can we delete them from the wiki purely on that argument as well, please? I think you get my feelings on using that particular argument. xD! Also, the argument that it's never used is quite weak considering the maps relative youth and the pace in which it has been developed meaning that there has been little to no time for a "stable" version of the map to try and make it onto the top 500 list. Naturally, being the article's creator, my opposition to it's deletion ''may'' not be quite as strong as other people's opinions. :P --[[User:Leftism|Leftism]] 12:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC) | :{{c|Oppose}} The map was recently used in the ETF2L Monday Night Madness cup, [http://etf2l.org/2010/10/23/mnm-6-announcement/ ] - clearly far from unheard of this side of the pond. Plus there are a (no offense to the map's authors) [[Moonshine|couple]] [[Atrophy (Capture the Flag)|of]] [[Deliverance|maps]] I've never heard of, can we delete them from the wiki purely on that argument as well, please? I think you get my feelings on using that particular argument. xD! Also, the argument that it's never used is quite weak considering the maps relative youth and the pace in which it has been developed meaning that there has been little to no time for a "stable" version of the map to try and make it onto the top 500 list. Naturally, being the article's creator, my opposition to it's deletion ''may'' not be quite as strong as other people's opinions. :P --[[User:Leftism|Leftism]] 12:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: {{c|comment}} Many of the maps ARE superfluous except for the official maps and some contest maps. Almost all are stubs. It's not a big map and unless someone is willing to expand it it should be trashed. If you're willing to put in time to detail it to the level of any official map then do so. [[User:Lemon|Lemon]] 22:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC) | :: {{c|comment}} Many of the maps ARE superfluous except for the official maps and some contest maps. Almost all are stubs. It's not a big map and unless someone is willing to expand it it should be trashed. If you're willing to put in time to detail it to the level of any official map then do so. [[User:Lemon|Lemon]] 22:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | :: {{c|comment}} My view is that only include community content (maps/mods) that are official (polycount), noted by valve (perhaps the art pass maps, and Saxton Hale Mod), or have a VERY large following (Dodgeball, Convoy, etc.) I have personally never heard of this map, but if enough people say no than no, otherwise yes. | + | :: {{c|comment}} My view is that only include community content (maps/mods) that are official (polycount), noted by valve (perhaps the art pass maps, and Saxton Hale Mod), or have a VERY large following (Dodgeball, Convoy, etc.) I have personally never heard of this map, but if enough people say no than no, otherwise yes.--[[User:Kurathedog|Kurathedog]] 04:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC) |
:{{c|Support}} Way too insignificant to warrant mention. I am willing to change my mind if someone is willing to put in the effort to work on it though. [[User:Lemon|Lemon]] 22:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC) | :{{c|Support}} Way too insignificant to warrant mention. I am willing to change my mind if someone is willing to put in the effort to work on it though. [[User:Lemon|Lemon]] 22:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
::{{c|Support}} [[User:Moussekateer|Moussekateer]] 22:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC) | ::{{c|Support}} [[User:Moussekateer|Moussekateer]] 22:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:47, 17 November 2010
Marked for Deletion Discussion
Support Nuke it. Never even heard of it myself. Vekter 04:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Oppose The map was recently used in the ETF2L Monday Night Madness cup, [1] - clearly far from unheard of this side of the pond. Plus there are a (no offense to the map's authors) couple of maps I've never heard of, can we delete them from the wiki purely on that argument as well, please? I think you get my feelings on using that particular argument. xD! Also, the argument that it's never used is quite weak considering the maps relative youth and the pace in which it has been developed meaning that there has been little to no time for a "stable" version of the map to try and make it onto the top 500 list. Naturally, being the article's creator, my opposition to it's deletion may not be quite as strong as other people's opinions. :P --Leftism 12:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Comment Many of the maps ARE superfluous except for the official maps and some contest maps. Almost all are stubs. It's not a big map and unless someone is willing to expand it it should be trashed. If you're willing to put in time to detail it to the level of any official map then do so. Lemon 22:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC)- Comment My view is that only include community content (maps/mods) that are official (polycount), noted by valve (perhaps the art pass maps, and Saxton Hale Mod), or have a VERY large following (Dodgeball, Convoy, etc.) I have personally never heard of this map, but if enough people say no than no, otherwise yes.--Kurathedog 04:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Way too insignificant to warrant mention. I am willing to change my mind if someone is willing to put in the effort to work on it though. Lemon 22:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Moussekateer 22:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Never played on it, never heard of it. Consealed 05:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support I agree it's not a major map. Just nuke it along with the other maps.Misterslin 16:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Not really notable. And the opening quotation looks so unprofessional. FlotsamX 19:19, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Neutral I'm not particularly in favor of deletion, as I have heard of this map and it has been making it's way around the European community, but I'm not in favor of keeping the article with a lack of substance either. -- Nineaxis 
00:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)- Support Never heard of it and played. --Parseus ( | talk) 06:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral If someone significantly expands the article, I'm in favor of keeping it. -- En Ex (talk) 15:55, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Just slap a Stub template on it and send it on its way. Eventually someone on the wiki will have played on it and will wish to expand upon it.--Focusknock s 15:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
