Difference between revisions of "Team Fortress Wiki:Archived discussions/Talk:Team Fortress 2 Argentina"
m (→Deletion) |
m |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*{{c|Support}} No need to have a wiki page for a community website. Keep them on a separate list, maybe add a link to the Argentinian version of the homepage or something. - [[User:Mistah Phoenix|Mistah Phoenix]] 02:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | *{{c|Support}} No need to have a wiki page for a community website. Keep them on a separate list, maybe add a link to the Argentinian version of the homepage or something. - [[User:Mistah Phoenix|Mistah Phoenix]] 02:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
*{{c|Support}} My rule of thumb about these mattters is "''If it wasn't at least mentioned on the official Blog, it shouldn't be on the official wiki''". But to be fair towards anyone, I think MasterOfTheXP's idea is the best.--[[User:Kid Of The Century|Kid Of The Century]] 10:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | *{{c|Support}} My rule of thumb about these mattters is "''If it wasn't at least mentioned on the official Blog, it shouldn't be on the official wiki''". But to be fair towards anyone, I think MasterOfTheXP's idea is the best.--[[User:Kid Of The Century|Kid Of The Century]] 10:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | *{{c|Support}} Gotta agree with MasterOfTheXP. [[User:404 User Not Found|404 User Not Found]] 14:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:21, 17 November 2010
Deletion
Support-Shine[] 20:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)- Support True, so true. Shock394 23:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Comment Not sure on this one. We do have community sites listed. Sure, this one isn't the best quality, but... well, it could be worked on? I don't know. ~ lhavelund(talk ▪ contrib) 00:12, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Oppose If we have pages for other community sites, I don't see why they shouldn't get one, assuming they improve it. Vekter 03:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Unless the community site have low amount of detail in it. Shock394 17:20, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support This, and other pages with only this much info on a site, should be moved into a list. Not with one line per site, but, you know, like Non-player characters is, with a section for every site. --MasterOfTheXP 04:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support I think we should not keep articles about non-English websites on wiki. Or, move them to proper wiki language. SiPlus 08:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- OluapPlayer (t)
01:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC) - Support I like XP's idea. Just put them in a nice list so anyone can look. --Vaught 02:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Parseus ( | talk) 06:13, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support (nanosheep_inc) 06:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose See Vekter's response above. Stab ! 23:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose What Vekter said. CANPoo 23:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support I want to third XP's idea. FlotsamX 04:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support There's probably more TF2 community pages than any of us can think of, but I don't think every one is notable. ButteredToast 17:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support No need to have a wiki page for a community website. Keep them on a separate list, maybe add a link to the Argentinian version of the homepage or something. - Mistah Phoenix 02:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support My rule of thumb about these mattters is "If it wasn't at least mentioned on the official Blog, it shouldn't be on the official wiki". But to be fair towards anyone, I think MasterOfTheXP's idea is the best.--Kid Of The Century 10:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Gotta agree with MasterOfTheXP. 404 User Not Found 14:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
