Difference between revisions of "Talk:Max's Severed Head"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Vintage)
(Vintage)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
:There is some guys with a vintage one. It's probably a glitch, just like vintage bill's hat -- [[File:User Swordz Swordz.png|25px]][[User:Swordz|<span style="color:#70B04A;font-size:13px;font-family:
 
:There is some guys with a vintage one. It's probably a glitch, just like vintage bill's hat -- [[File:User Swordz Swordz.png|25px]][[User:Swordz|<span style="color:#70B04A;font-size:13px;font-family:
 
'TF2 Build';text-shadow:#e3e3e3 1px 1px 0px;"><u>Swordz</u></span>]]{{mod}}[[File:User Swordz Swordz.png|25px]] <span style="font-size:10px">([[User talk:Swordz|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Swordz|contribs]])</span> 20:02, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 
'TF2 Build';text-shadow:#e3e3e3 1px 1px 0px;"><u>Swordz</u></span>]]{{mod}}[[File:User Swordz Swordz.png|25px]] <span style="font-size:10px">([[User talk:Swordz|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Swordz|contribs]])</span> 20:02, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 +
Should such glitches be mentioned on the main pages, or should they be contained to the discussion pages? [[User:Askindava|Askindava]] 20:11, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:11, 21 December 2010

Since it was modelled by Telltale, and used as a cross-promotion, does that in fact mean it qualifies as "community contributed?" I saw that someone just added it to that category, but didn't want to revert it if they were correct. Mar 21:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Its not community contributed. As you say, it was created by Telltale Games and given to Valve. While therefore contributed, that doesn't make it community contributed, which implies that it was made by the TF2 modding community. -- Sabre 01:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Is This Trivia?

"*According to TF2items.com statistics, Max's Severed Head is most wanted hat in the game (as of 27/10/2010)."
I don't think this is trivia, nor should even be considered a factual representation of hat want. Serg 22:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

You are correct sir, that is not trivia. Removed. Moussekateer 23:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Even though it isn't trivia, I've seen a remarkable number of people thinking it is, or putting it on this page without talking about it on the Talk page. Would be nice if people check the discussion page before adding this :) StarYoshi 20:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Vintage

I have heard it sworn that there is a vintage version of this hat but have never seen one. Can anyone confirm this either way?Askindava 20:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

There is some guys with a vintage one. It's probably a glitch, just like vintage bill's hat -- User Swordz Swordz.pngSwordzUser Swordz Swordz.png (talk | contribs) 20:02, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Should such glitches be mentioned on the main pages, or should they be contained to the discussion pages? Askindava 20:11, 21 December 2010 (UTC)