Difference between revisions of "User:Csphere"
m (oho, i am full of boredom what to doo?????) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | A casual, introvert Korean fellow, except they pursue the canon way of playing Demoman so badly. | + | A casual, introvert Korean fellow, except they pursue the canon way of playing [[Demoman]] so badly. |
There is a quote that goes ''Black lives matter'', so does that apply to Demoman. | There is a quote that goes ''Black lives matter'', so does that apply to Demoman. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
As the comparsion says, for example, the [[Direct Hit]] for [[Soldier|Soldiers]] is a wide-ranged weapon, with the average damage slightly more than the [[Grenade Launcher]] is able to deal, a lot higher momentum compared to how long it takes for the pipes to travel, and consistency of projectiles. | As the comparsion says, for example, the [[Direct Hit]] for [[Soldier|Soldiers]] is a wide-ranged weapon, with the average damage slightly more than the [[Grenade Launcher]] is able to deal, a lot higher momentum compared to how long it takes for the pipes to travel, and consistency of projectiles. | ||
Contrary to that, however, the Grenade Launcher requires the calculation using parabolic equation merged with t axis (stands for time), causing its projectiles to have a limited range to approach to the enemies. | Contrary to that, however, the Grenade Launcher requires the calculation using parabolic equation merged with t axis (stands for time), causing its projectiles to have a limited range to approach to the enemies. | ||
| − | Also it has an additional reloading time when empty, considering that it has the motion of opening the clip. Since the Direct Hit reloads faster and has a substantially high chance of butthurting Demoman reloading in the meantime, hence face-to-face encounters with no ammos would push those with the Direct Hit to winning. Makes no sense | + | Also it has an additional reloading time when empty, considering that it has the motion of opening the clip. Since the Direct Hit reloads faster and has a substantially high chance of butthurting Demoman reloading in the meantime, hence face-to-face encounters with no ammos would push those with the Direct Hit to winning. Makes no sense, urging the devs to forbid this unbalanced system and refrain demo from more dying in a silly way |
피자 존나 땡기네 | 피자 존나 땡기네 | ||
Revision as of 16:38, 31 October 2021
A casual, introvert Korean fellow, except they pursue the canon way of playing Demoman so badly.
There is a quote that goes Black lives matter, so does that apply to Demoman. Please god damn Valve just at least play as a Demoman with ordinary pipes instead of medival craps and give it a blast with major updates, appreciating the potential of him. He is much depicted weak because of the burden of extremely limited practical uses. As the comparsion says, for example, the Direct Hit for Soldiers is a wide-ranged weapon, with the average damage slightly more than the Grenade Launcher is able to deal, a lot higher momentum compared to how long it takes for the pipes to travel, and consistency of projectiles. Contrary to that, however, the Grenade Launcher requires the calculation using parabolic equation merged with t axis (stands for time), causing its projectiles to have a limited range to approach to the enemies. Also it has an additional reloading time when empty, considering that it has the motion of opening the clip. Since the Direct Hit reloads faster and has a substantially high chance of butthurting Demoman reloading in the meantime, hence face-to-face encounters with no ammos would push those with the Direct Hit to winning. Makes no sense, urging the devs to forbid this unbalanced system and refrain demo from more dying in a silly way
피자 존나 땡기네
