Difference between revisions of "Talk:Team strategy"
Wintergreen (talk | contribs) (Stupid signature!) |
m (stated my opinion on the class section) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The classes, by themselves, already have their own strategy geared for single player uses. While I came across this article to edit, it seemed that the class section is, by itself, unnecessary since it does not conjure a strategy which revolves around team play. It seem more like a beginner's guide to it rather than how to improve your skills by using your skills for the betterment of the team. Either we should delete that section or revision it to be more team orientated.[[User:Wintergreen|Wintergreen]] 05:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | The classes, by themselves, already have their own strategy geared for single player uses. While I came across this article to edit, it seemed that the class section is, by itself, unnecessary since it does not conjure a strategy which revolves around team play. It seem more like a beginner's guide to it rather than how to improve your skills by using your skills for the betterment of the team. Either we should delete that section or revision it to be more team orientated.[[User:Wintergreen|Wintergreen]] 05:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * I disagree. I think this section explains the basics of team strategy very well. Sure, it's a beginner's guide, but I see nothing wrong with that. It's not like beginners don't use the Wiki. [[User:Zoon-li|Zoon-li]] 16:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:09, 10 February 2011
Just a heads up, I'm going to be reorganizing this page. I'll be moving some things around and adding a new section on overall strategy, Team Class Compostion, and a better way to categorize the classes. --Aranarth 16:40, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Good luck this page is a mess. Meter1060 20:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello, if there is no problem, I will make some minor changes to the text so it is easier to read, and fix some grammar issues. Stukov Wolfwood 17:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Well in the end i did a bigger job that i expected to do. Hope this is way better than what it was before. Stukov Wolfwood 21:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- This page might be marked for cleanup, but the sections I added (The Classes) and also the sections on Team Composition and Communication are PART of that cleanup. In any case, always post on the discussion page BEFORE you do major reworking of an article that took someone else a great deal of time and effort to come up with. If you don't tell me why you think the sections on this page deserve to be completely replaced with something else, I'm going to undo your edits. Discuss first, which I'm happy to do, THEN delete.
If you want to add, feel free to add without asking permission unless it's a redundant (unnecessary or appears on other pages) addition, but subtraction needs to be done more carefully. --Aranarth 03:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Why do we need a Class Section?
The classes, by themselves, already have their own strategy geared for single player uses. While I came across this article to edit, it seemed that the class section is, by itself, unnecessary since it does not conjure a strategy which revolves around team play. It seem more like a beginner's guide to it rather than how to improve your skills by using your skills for the betterment of the team. Either we should delete that section or revision it to be more team orientated.Wintergreen 05:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree. I think this section explains the basics of team strategy very well. Sure, it's a beginner's guide, but I see nothing wrong with that. It's not like beginners don't use the Wiki. Zoon-li 16:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
