Difference between revisions of "Talk:Golden Wrench"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
::: This means they are going to be numbered. They might simply be rare. I guess we'll find out soon. -[[User:Firestorm|<font color=#FF6600><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></font>]] 01:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::: This means they are going to be numbered. They might simply be rare. I guess we'll find out soon. -[[User:Firestorm|<font color=#FF6600><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></font>]] 01:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::::Soon enough, I hope. I'm sleepy. Also SPUF is a mess right now. [[User:Delicious cake|Delicious cake]] 01:31, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 
::::Soon enough, I hope. I'm sleepy. Also SPUF is a mess right now. [[User:Delicious cake|Delicious cake]] 01:31, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 +
::::Also "TF_HUD_Event_GoldenWrench_D" "%s1 has destroyed Golden Wrench no. %s2!", which implies that you can actually lose it. Thus I suppose it will be re-obtainable somehow (OMG trading system?) — [[User:WindPower|WindPower]] 01:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:41, 2 July 2010

I've never heard of this weapon. i'm guessing it's fake. Darkman 4 01:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind, its legit. Darkman 4 01:03, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
This is all only speculation, I'll clean it up. -Firestorm 01:04, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Heh, a VMT file. Time to fire up the model viewer. Vi3trice 01:06, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

SPUF at it again? Delicious cake 01:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh oh oh, it looks pretty.

Gold2.png

Vi3trice 01:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

I swear I'll rage if this is another service medal... Delicious cake 01:26, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
It looks like it is, considering the line: "TF_HUD_Event_GoldenWrench_C" "%s1 has found Golden Wrench no. %s2!"
This means they are going to be numbered. They might simply be rare. I guess we'll find out soon. -Firestorm 01:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Soon enough, I hope. I'm sleepy. Also SPUF is a mess right now. Delicious cake 01:31, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Also "TF_HUD_Event_GoldenWrench_D" "%s1 has destroyed Golden Wrench no. %s2!", which implies that you can actually lose it. Thus I suppose it will be re-obtainable somehow (OMG trading system?) — WindPower 01:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)