Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Set"
(→Getting a little hasty with the new Uber update sets: new section) |
(→Getting a little hasty with the new Uber update sets) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
We don't even know if they're item sets, if they have set bonuses or anything like that. They could just be a group of related items that otherwise have no real bonus to using them all together. I'd say let's hold off until we know for sure. [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 12:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC) | We don't even know if they're item sets, if they have set bonuses or anything like that. They could just be a group of related items that otherwise have no real bonus to using them all together. I'd say let's hold off until we know for sure. [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 12:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | :I'd say let's hold on until we know for sure. {{n}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Image|RED}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Text|Epic|#5885A2}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Text|Eric|#B8383B}} {{User:EpicEric/Sig/Image|BLU}}{{User:EpicEric/Sig/Extra}} 14:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:19, 21 June 2011
Header links
Why not link the item sets back to their stub on the set page? GJ 20:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- They already do link back to Item sets. -The Neotank (Talk) 00:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- The icon to the side does, but the header doesn't. I didn't even realize the icon to the side was a link. GJ 03:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Getting a little hasty with the new Uber update sets
We don't even know if they're item sets, if they have set bonuses or anything like that. They could just be a group of related items that otherwise have no real bonus to using them all together. I'd say let's hold off until we know for sure. Balladofwindfishes 12:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)