Difference between revisions of "Talk:Medieval Update"
(→Addention of model images) |
(→Addention of model images) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
: If we can find them --[[User:ScoutKast|ScoutKast]] 21:29, 2 August 2011 (PDT) | : If we can find them --[[User:ScoutKast|ScoutKast]] 21:29, 2 August 2011 (PDT) | ||
| + | ::There were images in the book pages, that werew the download links--[[User:Flashflood153|Flashflood153]] 11:23, 3 August 2011 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:23, 3 August 2011
Blog mention
Hi, just wondering, is there any confirmation or source that shows this will be blog mentioned? 
Scatman John
(Talk | Contrib) 17:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- 17:52 - Pie_Tony: better not, has some reveiling things on it
- When asked for a screenshot of the email - Pogo 17:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well that's not very helpful. I think a copy should be saved to your sandbox and this article deleted from the main namespace until it is featured in a blog post. —
Moussekateer·talk 18:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Well that's not very helpful. I think a copy should be saved to your sandbox and this article deleted from the main namespace until it is featured in a blog post. —
News mention
Its featured in the news section. This article should not be deleted. {{subst:void|This template should always be substituted. Please change {{Unsigned}} to {{subst:Unsigned}}}}— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ruffmajorkc (talk) • (contribs) 2024-11-04, 13:35 UTC
- Who's saying it should be deleted? Balladofwindfishes 12:43, 27 July 2011 (PDT)
Addention of model images
Since there were models in the update shoudn't we try to show them here to?--Flashflood153 20:15, 2 August 2011 (PDT)
- If we can find them --ScoutKast 21:29, 2 August 2011 (PDT)
- There were images in the book pages, that werew the download links--Flashflood153 11:23, 3 August 2011 (PDT)
