Difference between revisions of "Talk:Backburner"
Jimbo Jambo (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'Firstly I'd like like to make it clear that the Backburner was in fact affected by the (now) 10% damage nerf to the flamethrower. The BB does 15% more than the ''current'' damage…') |
(→HIDDEN: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Secondly, is there a way we can express this on the page? Right now it's kind of misleading by not mentioning the nerf, implying that the Backburner actually got a straight 15% damage buff. [[User:Jimbo Jambo|Jimbo Jambo]] 06:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC) | Secondly, is there a way we can express this on the page? Right now it's kind of misleading by not mentioning the nerf, implying that the Backburner actually got a straight 15% damage buff. [[User:Jimbo Jambo|Jimbo Jambo]] 06:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == HIDDEN == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes? No? Should HIDDEN stats be added to the weapon info boxes? --[[User:Firestorm|<font color="#FF6600"><tt><big><u>'''Firestorm'''</u></big></tt></font>]] {{mod}} 18:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:20, 9 August 2010
Firstly I'd like like to make it clear that the Backburner was in fact affected by the (now) 10% damage nerf to the flamethrower. The BB does 15% more than the current damage of flamethrower, not the pre-update damage; if it did that, it would be doing closer to 25% more than the current FT damage, which it isn't according to the numbers here. So compared to the old Backburner, it's actually doing only about 3.5% more (115% of 90%), not 15%.
Secondly, is there a way we can express this on the page? Right now it's kind of misleading by not mentioning the nerf, implying that the Backburner actually got a straight 15% damage buff. Jimbo Jambo 06:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
HIDDEN
Yes? No? Should HIDDEN stats be added to the weapon info boxes? --Firestorm 18:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
