Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Equip region table"
(→Missing the "hat" region: new section) |
(→Missing the "hat" region) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Yes, I know that having the "hat" region in the table will make that particular cell very bloated, but otherwise it's basically missing information. Probably just including all the icons and not their names wouldn't be too bad - we can't just say "anything not mentioned above" because some things are both Hat and something else. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] 08:22, 22 October 2011 (PDT) | Yes, I know that having the "hat" region in the table will make that particular cell very bloated, but otherwise it's basically missing information. Probably just including all the icons and not their names wouldn't be too bad - we can't just say "anything not mentioned above" because some things are both Hat and something else. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] 08:22, 22 October 2011 (PDT) | ||
| + | : It would just be easier to state "all hats are 'hat' region unless they are whole head" [[User:Balladofwindfishes|Balladofwindfishes]] 08:47, 22 October 2011 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:47, 22 October 2011
And the hats?
Some hats, like the Desert Marauder, also take certain equip regions. Shouldn't they be added as well? - Selbi 18:43, 19 October 2011 (PDT)
- Working on this. —
Moussekateer·talk 18:51, 19 October 2011 (PDT)
Done —Moussekateer·talk 21:25, 19 October 2011 (PDT)
Missing the "hat" region
Yes, I know that having the "hat" region in the table will make that particular cell very bloated, but otherwise it's basically missing information. Probably just including all the icons and not their names wouldn't be too bad - we can't just say "anything not mentioned above" because some things are both Hat and something else. Toomai Glittershine 08:22, 22 October 2011 (PDT)
- It would just be easier to state "all hats are 'hat' region unless they are whole head" Balladofwindfishes 08:47, 22 October 2011 (PDT)
