Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ghastly Gibus"
(→Limited vs. Non limited) |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:The above does not make it any less Hatty. -- [[User:Smashman|Smashman...]] {{bur}} <sub>([[User_talk:Smashman|t]] • <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/smashman2004 s])</span></sub> 21:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC) | :The above does not make it any less Hatty. -- [[User:Smashman|Smashman...]] {{bur}} <sub>([[User_talk:Smashman|t]] • <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/smashman2004 s])</span></sub> 21:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::[[:Category:Hats]] is added by the infobox & the hat nav. [[User:Seb26|<font color="#0B61A4">'''seb26'''</font>]] <span style="font-size:95%;">[[User talk:Seb26|[talk]]]</span> 21:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:49, 26 August 2010
Limited vs. Non limited
While I can see your point Seb, the original release of the Gibus was limited, with only 10319 being released, with each being numbered (Even though it doesn't show in game), thus I believe limited is viable. -- Smashman... (t • s) 21:26, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- You can still dominate a player today and earn a gibus if you haven't already got one. It's not really limited at all. seb26 [talk] 21:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- I am aware of that. And yet the original numbered Gibuses are limited to a number of 10319, which is precisely what limited means. A specific number are released. Just because more can derive from the original number make the original no less limited. Do you see? -- Smashman... (t • s) 21:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- I see, but when you glance at the infobox and see "limited", then glance back at the rest of the article and see that it says you can still earn the Gibus by dominating a player who owns one... And since both the numbered and unnumbered Gibuses are exactly the same bar the hidden number... Yes, technically, the Gibus was "limited", but now it no longer is. The rest of the article reflects this and so should the infobox. seb26 [talk] 21:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Limited & Unlockable? --Firestorm 21:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
This is a truth. I guess for glancing factor, Unlockable should remain, no point in removing the Category as it is limited too. -- Smashman... (t • s) 21:44, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above does not make it any less Hatty. -- Smashman... (t • s) 21:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Category:Hats is added by the infobox & the hat nav. seb26 [talk] 21:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)